Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relative motion and light

  1. Aug 16, 2012 #1
    In an ideal environment, if a light source is moving directly away from you at the speed of light will the light act like an object that is acted upon by two opposing forces and stand still? Would we be able to see the light source? Thanks!

    Secman
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 16, 2012 #2

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's not possible, even in an ideal experiment.
     
  4. Aug 16, 2012 #3
    Which part? The speed of light part? If so can we assume it's possible for this system?
     
  5. Aug 16, 2012 #4

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes.

    If we do this, we can't use relativity to make predictions about the consequences.
     
  6. Aug 16, 2012 #5

    ghwellsjr

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If you assume that it's possible for your system, then you get to make up your own laws of physics and you can make up anything you want. No one is going to be able to second-guess what you might dream up. But you're not allowed to speculate on such matters on this forum. This forum is to learn about relativity and how it explains the real world, not to pretend that the world is different so you can make up your own fantasy.
     
  7. Aug 16, 2012 #6

    Nugatory

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    As phrased, the question has no answer, as there is no such thing as a light source "moving directly away from you at the speed of light". However, there is a very closely related question which does make sense and does have an answer:
    And the answer is:
    1) No, the light will not almost stand still. In a vacuum, light travels at the speed c regardless of the velocity of the source or the target.

    2) Because of the first answer, yes, the light will get to you so you'll be able to detect it. The light will be red-shifted, and if it's red-shifted enough it won't register on your eyes, so you may not be able to literally "see" the light source, but if you have the right instruments (for example an infra-red night vision device for moderate red-shifts) you will be able to detect it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2012
  8. Aug 16, 2012 #7

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'd like to point out that the OP said only "light source" and never mentioned anything about a flashlight or some-such thing that has mass.

    It requires a bit more, then, than simply the axioms of special relativity to rule out the possibility of a massless particle (moving away from you) decaying into more massless particles (one of which is moving towards you). Perhaps momentum or energy conservation prevents this, but I cannot confirm this without taking out a pen and paper...especially if we include the possibilities of many (n-particle) decays.

    At a more fundamental level, perhaps quantum field theory prevents such decays?

    EDIT: I had not considered the red-shift effect. Perhaps that itself would prevent this decay since any potential photon emitted would be red-shifted to 0-frequency.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Relative motion and light
  1. Relativity And Light (Replies: 68)

  2. Light and Relativity (Replies: 1)

  3. Relativity and light (Replies: 4)

Loading...