- #1

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter neilparker62
- Start date

- #1

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

- #2

- 23,233

- 14,741

I can give you a quick answer, as I'm just going offline for a while.

You can follow the same method by considering the COM frame. In that frame, the two particles have the same speed before and after the collision and move in opposite directions.

However, if one particle is at rest in your frame and the other is moving at a speed ##u##, then the COM frame is

So, when you transform the resulting velocities back to your frame you get slightly different expressions and the angle is not a right angle.

Do you know enough SR to work this out yourself?

- #3

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

I can give you a quick answer, as I'm just going offline for a while.

So, when you transform the resulting velocities back to your frame you get slightly different expressions and the angle is not a right angle.

Do you know enough SR to work this out yourself?

Thanks for your response - unfortunately I don't. The query arises out of following discussion which I think has reached an incorrect conclusion - in light of what you are saying.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...vistic-elastic-collision.950954/#post-6056515

If I read you correctly we DO get angular 'distortion' when SR equations are applied to collision problems. And therefore maximum angle of deflection (elastic collision) is NOT the same as it would be when calculated using classical physics. Although as is usual with SR the classical equations will work fine for v<<c.

- #4

- 23,233

- 14,741

Thanks for your response - unfortunately I don't. The query arises out of following discussion which I think has reached an incorrect conclusion - in light of what you are saying.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...vistic-elastic-collision.950954/#post-6056515

If I read you correctly we DO get angular 'distortion' when SR equations are applied to collision problems. And therefore maximum angle of deflection (elastic collision) is NOT the same as it would be when calculated using classical physics. Although as is usual with SR the classical equations will work fine for v<<c.

I haven't had time to digest that thread. It's mostly talking about the unequal mass collision. Let me check my working and get back to you. I may have time today.

- #5

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

https://users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~smithb/website/coursenotes/rel_A.pdf

See in particular Eqn 4.80 and following conclusion.

- #6

- 23,233

- 14,741

https://users.physics.ox.ac.uk/~smithb/website/coursenotes/rel_A.pdf

See in particular Eqn 4.80 and following conclusion.

Yes, exactly. In the relativistic case, the angle is not ##\pi/2##.

- #7

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

I think I'm correct in saying that if mass M (>m) is incident on stationary mass m with collision angle = θ(max) the post collision trajectories are also orthogonal per classical theory.

- #8

vela

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Education Advisor

- 15,677

- 2,314

Equation 4.80 was derived using the assumption ##m=M##. The problem in the thread you're looking at considers a collision between unequal masses.Can we apply Eqn 4.80 to solve the problem on maximum angle of deflection for a relativistic collision as per original problem posed in that thread ? Would be interested to see if we can find where that √3 comes in.

From the expression for ##\theta_1## right before 4.80, you can write

$$\tan \theta_1 = \frac{\sin\theta_0}{\gamma(\cos\theta_0+1)} = \frac{2\sin\frac{\theta_0}{2}\cos\frac{\theta_0}{2}}{\gamma(2\cos^2 \frac{\theta_0}{2})} = \frac 1\gamma \tan\frac{\theta_0}{2}.$$ For any value of ##\gamma##, you should be able to convince yourself that ##\theta_{1\text{max}}=\pi/2##.

- #9

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

From the expression for ##\theta_1## right before 4.80, you can write

$$\tan \theta_1 = \frac{\sin\theta_0}{\gamma(\cos\theta_0+1)} = \frac{2\sin\frac{\theta_0}{2}\cos\frac{\theta_0}{2}}{\gamma(2\cos^2 \frac{\theta_0}{2})} = \frac 1\gamma \tan\frac{\theta_0}{2}.$$ For any value of ##\gamma##, you should be able to convince yourself that ##\theta_{1\text{max}}=\pi/2##.

I don't think there's any problem with this conclusion - it's showing maximum recoil angle = 90. Which is true for any collision between any mass m<=M. Doesn't it just mean there's no forward scattering of object m ?

- #10

vela

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Education Advisor

- 15,677

- 2,314

I thought you were trying to figure out where the ##\sqrt 3## comes from when ##M \gg m##.I don't think there's any problem with this conclusion - it's showing maximum recoil angle = 90. Which is true for any collision between any mass m<=M. Doesn't it just mean there's no forward scattering of object m ?

- #11

neilparker62

Homework Helper

- 932

- 456

In the original problem, don't forget the stipulation that γ = M/m.

I am aware that the formulas in the Oxford reference deal with an elastic collision between equal masses but I was hoping to see what would change (under SR) in that instance and then try to adapt it for the problem in the other post. Under SR it seems that angles have some dependence on γ - hence on velocity. Whereas in classical physics both the π/2 (sum of angles) and maximum deflection sinθ = m/M results are independent of velocity.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 450

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 414

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 697

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 553

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 709

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 312

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 405

- Last Post

- Replies
- 30

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 932

- Last Post

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 801