Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relativistic kinetic energy

  1. Jun 15, 2013 #1
    I am doing the integral DK = ∫pdv = mv/(√1-v2/c2)dv , in the same way as they do the ∫Fds = ∫mvdv if you separate the integrals. Where is my mistake and istead of (γ-1)mc2 I get -mc2/γ . I know that I am mistaken, I did see some equations but I don't get the 'theoretical' part.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 15, 2013 #2

    PAllen

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I don't think this approach is valid. The equivalence of ∫Fds to ∫pdv is based on dp/dt being m(dv/dt) which is false in SR because dp/dt needs to include terms from dγ/dt. So your starting point: that you can use ∫pdv as long as you use relativistic momentum is false.
     
  4. Jun 15, 2013 #3

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The integral you should be doing is ∫Fds = ∫(dp/dt)ds = ∫v dp. Nonrelativistically, ∫v dp = ∫p dv since they are both equal to ∫mv dv, but relativistically they are different.

    Start from the beginning. The energy-momentum 4-vector is p = (γmc, γmv). Its proper time derivative is

    dp/dτ = (mc dγ/dτ, m d(γv)/dτ)

    Since its magnitude is constant, p·dp/dτ = 0. Written out, this is

    0 = γm2c2 dγ/dτ - γm2v d(γv)/dτ
    divide by γm: mc2 dγ/dτ = mv d(γv)/dτ. Integrate:

    ∫mc2 dγ/dτ dτ = ∫mv d(γv)/dτ dτ
    mc2 γ + const = ∫v d(mγv)

    Choosing a constant of integration, this identity expresses the fact that. even relativistically, the kinetic energy is equal to ∫v dp
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Relativistic kinetic energy
Loading...