1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Relativistic momentum

  1. Nov 22, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A particle with mass m has speed 0.802c relative to inertial frame S. The particle collides with an identical particle at rest relative to frame S. Relative to S and in terms of c, what is the speed of a frame S' in which the total momentum of these particles is zero? This frame is called the centre of momentum frame.

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution
    If particle 2 is at rest in the S frame, then in the S' frame particle 2 must have the same velocity as the S' frame relative to the S frame, but I'm not sure how to apply this.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 22, 2016 #2

    hilbert2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Do you know how to form the four-momentum vector for a massive particle in one spatial dimension, and how to write Lorentz transformations as matrices? In this case the vector has effectively only two components and the transformations are 2x2 matrices. You will find help here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/vec4.html

    You just have to form an equation for the value of ##\gamma## in the Lorentz transformation that makes the momenta equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.
     
  4. Nov 22, 2016 #3

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Do you know how to transform velocities from one frame to another?
     
  5. Nov 22, 2016 #4
    @PeroK are you referring to using the equation
    v = (u + v')/(1 + uv'/c2)
     
  6. Nov 22, 2016 #5

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yes, you can use that equation. I assume you haven't covered energy-momentum transformations yet? If not, then the above formula is the way to go.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Relativistic momentum
  1. Relativistic momentum (Replies: 1)

  2. Relativistic momentum (Replies: 2)

  3. Relativistic Momentum (Replies: 2)

  4. Relativistic Momentum (Replies: 1)

Loading...