• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Relativistic speed

  • Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A particle of mass 1 gm starts from rest and moves under the action of a force of 30
Newtons defined in the rest frame. It will reach 99% the velocity of light in time
(a) 9.9 x 10³ sec (b) 7 x 10⁴ sec (c) 0.999 sec (d) 0.7 sec

2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution

I can safely disregard (c) and (d)

(a) can be found by kinematic calculation.But as the particle moves in relativistic speed, this classical calculation does not hold.

(b) looks correct to me.

But how to prove this?

Can anyone suggest anything?
 
as speed increases,the value of m(v) also increases,thus reducing the acceleration.Thus, it takes longer time...In that respect (b) looks plausible.
 

kdv

336
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A particle of mass 1 gm starts from rest and moves under the action of a force of 30
Newtons defined in the rest frame. It will reach 99% the velocity of light in time
(a) 9.9 x 10³ sec (b) 7 x 10⁴ sec (c) 0.999 sec (d) 0.7 sec

2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution

I can safely disregard (c) and (d)

(a) can be found by kinematic calculation.But as the particle moves in relativistic speed, this classical calculation does not hold.

(b) looks correct to me.

But how to prove this?

Can anyone suggest anything?

In relativity, [tex] F = \frac{dp}{dt} [/tex] still holds. For a constant force you have then

[tex] p_{final} - p_{initial} = F \Delta t [/tex]

setting p initial equal to zero and using for the final [tex]p= \gamma m v [/tex] gives the correct answer, which is indeed b.


Note: your argument is correct and it's sufficient if all you need is to pick the correct answer quickly from a choice of answers. I just wanted to show you how to do the calculation if you needed that at some point.
 
Last edited:
Yes,I followed your argument.

Thanks for your help.
 
Tell me one thing.The force is specified to be 30 dyne in its own rest frame.So, is the increase of mass is to be considered at all?
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top