- #1

- 182

- 2

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- B
- Thread starter Einstein's Cat
- Start date

- #1

- 182

- 2

- #2

jedishrfu

Mentor

- 13,580

- 7,568

http://www.spacetimetravel.org/fussball/fussball.html

The sphere becomes an ellipsoid but due to the finite speed of light and the fact that the light travels different distances to reach your eye you will still see a sphere.

A similar case occurs with a relativistic cube where the cube contracts relative to the stationary observer but the observer actually sees a cube rotated slight toward him/her so that you see the side and the back together because light from the fornt edge gets to your eyes sooner than light from the back edge.

http://www.spacetimetravel.org/tompkins/node1.html

Look up Terrell rotation for more details:

http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/courses/m309-01a/cook/terrell1.html

- #3

- 10,149

- 1,299

It's easier if you consider a sphere at rest in it's own reference frame, and asks what happens if you ask what it's shape is in some frame moving relative to the sphere's rest frame. That way you don't have to worry about the notion of "rigidity".

The sphere when seen from a moving frame does indeed Lorentz contract in one direction, assuming the shape of an ellipsoid. The volume of the sphere in the moving reference frame is lower, volume is therefore a frame-dependent quantity like length is.

- #4

- 182

- 2

What is the relationship between the volume of the ellipsoid and its radius?It's easier if you consider a sphere at rest in it's own reference frame, and asks what happens if you ask what it's shape is in some frame moving relative to the sphere's rest frame. That way you don't have to worry about the notion of "rigidity".

The sphere when seen from a moving frame does indeed Lorentz contract in one direction, assuming the shape of an ellipsoid. The volume of the sphere in the moving reference frame is lower, volume is therefore a frame-dependent quantity like length is.

- #5

jedishrfu

Mentor

- 13,580

- 7,568

- #6

- 182

- 2

- #7

Ibix

Science Advisor

- 9,056

- 8,753

The ones in the y and z direction don't change. The one in the x direction scales as ##\gamma##.

- #8

- 182

- 2

I see because length contraction is in the direction of one dimensional motion. I apologise but what does the quote above mean?the x direction scales as ##\gamma##.

- #9

Ibix

Science Advisor

- 9,056

- 8,753

- #10

- 182

- 2

Sorry to go on but when you say scale do you perhaps mean that "x new"x direction scales as ##\gamma##.

= 1/Lamda * "x rest"?

- #11

Ibix

Science Advisor

- 9,056

- 8,753

That's a gamma (##\gamma##), not a lambda (##\lambda##), but otherwise yes.Sorry to go on but when you say scale do you perhaps mean that "x new"

= 1/Lamda * "x rest"?

- #12

- 182

- 2

Thank you very much and I'll go and revise greek letters!That's a gamma (##\gamma##), not a lambda (##\lambda##), but otherwise yes.

Share: