Calculating Relativistic Velocity: A Cosmic Journey

In summary, we discussed the scenario of an interstellar spaceship accelerating at 1g for the first half of its journey and decelerating at 1g for the second half. This would result in the velocity going beyond the speed of light, which is not possible. To find the relativistic versions of v(t)=at and d(t)=0.5at2, we can use the world line formula for a uniformly accelerating particle and the Newtonian formulas for small time intervals. However, for someone on the ship, dividing distance in the original frame by their proper time will result in a number larger than c, but this is not a violation of special relativity.
  • #1
servo75
3
0
I saw the following scenario on an episode of Cosmos: An interstellar spaceship accelerates at 1g for the 1st half of a journey to a distant star and then decelerates at 1g for the 2nd half. So with constant acceleration, the velocity would go beyond c at some point, which is not possible. So how would one find the relativistic versions of

v(t)=at

and

d(t)=0.5at2

(assuming x0=v0= 0)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The world line of a uniformly accelerating particle is given by

x = (c2/a) cosh(aτ/c)
t = (c/a) sinh(aτ/c)

where τ is the particle's proper time. The velocity is v = x/t = c tanh(aτ/c), which is always less than c.

For small τ we can expand the functions and recover the Newtonian formulas:
x ≈ (c2/a)(1 + ½(aτ/c)2 + ...) = c2/a + ½aτ2
t ≈ (c/a)(aτ/c + ... ) = τ
v ≈ c(aτ/c - ...) = aτ

(Note that these nice formulas displace the origin, and use x0 = c2/a)
 
  • #3
The velocity is v = x/t = c tanh(aτ/c)
Sorry, should be v = dx/dt = (dx/dτ)/(dt/dτ) = (c sinh(aτ/c))/(cosh(aτ/c)) = c tanh(aτ/c)
 
  • #4
See also http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
If an agent in the initial rest frame expends energy to accelerate the traveler beyond C, he finds increasing (classically unexpected) inertial resistance, with diminishing returns as the traveler appears to get "heavier" as it accelerates.
 
  • #6
1977ub, I believe you misread the question. We're not talking about the effect of an applied external force, presumably constant in the initial rest frame. This is a spaceship accelerating under its own thrust, constant in its own instantaneous rest frame.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
This is a standard problem. The acceleration g is in the instantaneous rest system of the spaceship, not in the original fixed system.
For an acceleration g in the instantaneous rest system of the spaceship, the velocity is (with c=1)
[tex]v=\frac{gt}{\sqrt{1+g^2t^2}}=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex].
The distance traveled is
[tex]x=\left(\sqrt{1+g^2t^2}-1\right)/g[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Bill_K said:
1977ub, I believe you misread the question. We're not talking about the effect of an applied external force, presumably constant in the initial rest frame. This is a spaceship accelerating under its own thrust, constant in its own instantaneous rest frame.

Actually I didn't finish my thought with that post because I couldn't figure out / remember certain things about the issue in the ship's perspective. It's pretty straightforward to decide the velocity of the ship from the perspective of the original frame, and issues which stand in the way of success of getting to c for an external agent.

For someone on the ship, how do they determine what is standing in the way of getting to c? How do they determine their rate wrt the original frame at any given moment?

If they trust / use the original frame's mileposts, which are encountered to be coming closer and closer together, will the decide that they must be > c wrt the original frame?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
1977ub said:
If they trust / use the original frame's mileposts, which are encountered to be coming closer and closer together, will the decide that they must be > c wrt the original frame?
If they divide distance in the launch frame by their own proper time then they will indeed get a number larger than c. This is not a violation of SR because the specified quantity is not a velocity.
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
If they divide distance in the launch frame by their own proper time then they will indeed get a number larger than c. This is not a violation of SR because the specified quantity is not a velocity.

Ok Thanks that's what I thought. [everyone on the ship breaks out the champagne]
 

1. How is relativistic velocity different from regular velocity?

Relativistic velocity takes into account the effects of special relativity, which describes how time and space are perceived differently by observers moving at different speeds. This means that as an object approaches the speed of light, its perceived length and time intervals will change, making its velocity appear different from a stationary observer's perspective.

2. What is the formula for calculating relativistic velocity?

The formula for calculating relativistic velocity is v = c * (1 - (1 / (1 - (v0/c)2)1/2)), where v is the relativistic velocity, c is the speed of light, and v0 is the initial velocity.

3. How does the speed of light affect relativistic velocity?

The speed of light is a constant in the formula for calculating relativistic velocity. As an object approaches the speed of light, its perceived length and time intervals will change, making its velocity appear different from a stationary observer's perspective. This is due to the fact that the speed of light is the maximum speed at which any object can travel in the universe.

4. Can relativistic velocity be observed in everyday life?

Relativistic velocity is typically only observed in extreme circumstances, such as objects traveling at extremely high speeds or in gravitational fields. In everyday life, the effects of special relativity are negligible and not noticeable to the human eye.

5. How is relativistic velocity used in space travel?

In space travel, relativistic velocity is taken into account in order to accurately calculate the travel time and trajectory of a spacecraft. It is also important in understanding the effects of time dilation, where time appears to pass slower for objects traveling at high velocities. Without considering relativistic velocity, space travel calculations would be inaccurate and could lead to significant errors.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
975
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
6
Replies
200
Views
10K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
6K
Back
Top