Hi all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I posted this question in the homework section yesterday but has gone unanswered so far.

Most of you are probably familiar with the twin paradox of relativity, which is the basis of this problem. I think I understand it fairly well but am having trouble with one specific detail. Here is the setup:

Problem

We have two planets, the earth and canopus, that are separated by a distance of 99 light years in the earth frame. A rocket (R1) traveling from the earth to canopus travels at such a speed that it will arrive at canopus in 101 years. Upon arriving at canopus, the occupant in the rocket will instantaneously jump from the first rocket to a second rocket (R2) traveling the same speed but now pointed towards the earth.

For the earth, there is a string a clocks that infinitely stretch out towards canopus (the positive direction) and away from the direction of canopus (the negative direction). These clocks are synchronized to the clock on earth. A similar set of clocks are attached to the rockets and are synchronized to the clock on the rocket.

There are six events that occur in the problem.

Event 1: R1 leaves earth

Event 2: R1 reaches canopus

Event 3: Rocket station S1 passes earth

(S1 is the station that reaches earth at the same time that R1 reaches canopus in the R1 frame)

Event 4: R2 leaves canopus

Event 5: Rocket station S2 passes earth

(S2 is the station that reaches earth at the same time that R2 leaves canopus in the R2 frame)

There are six clocks

Clock 1: on earth

Clock 2: on canopus

Clock 3: on R1

Clock 4: on S1

Clock 5: on R2

Clock 6: on S2

I am told to find the times of all six clocks at each of the six events in the earth frame.

Attempted Solution

Well, I found the times of all the clocks of, except clock 4 at event 1 and clock 6 at event 6. If I can find out how to obtain the time from clock 4, I can probably find the time for clock 6 as well.

I started by using the equation [tex]t^2_E - x^2_E = t^2_R - x^2_R[/tex] where "E" stands for Earth and "R" stands for Rocket. I am attempting to solve for [tex]t_E[/tex]. [tex]t_R[/tex] is equal to 0 since this is the reference event for the problem.

But before I could substitute numbers to this equation, I had to find the value of [tex]x_R[/tex] at event 2 and [tex]x_E[/tex] at event 3.

For [tex]x_R[/tex], I used the value found for [tex]t_R[/tex] at event 2.

[tex]t^2_R = t^2_E - x^2_E [/tex]

[tex]t^2_R = 101^2 - 99^2 [/tex]

[tex]t^2_R = 400[/tex]

[tex] t_R = 20[/tex]

Multiply this distance times the rocket speed (which is 99/101 = .98) to give us 19.6 years in distance between the rocket at canopus and the earth. It is also the distance between the S1 clock in event 3 as it passes

the earth. Back to our main equation, [tex]t^2_E - x^2_E = t^2_R - x^2_R[/tex], we now have the value of [tex]x_R[/tex] (19.6)

For [tex]x_E[/tex], I used the value found for [tex]t_E[/tex] at event 3.

[tex]t^2_E = t^2_R - x^2_R [/tex]

[tex]t^2_E = 20^2 - 19.6^2 [/tex]

[tex]t^2_E = 15.84[/tex]

[tex] t_R = 3.98[/tex]

Finally substituting all of our values into [tex]t^2_E - x^2_E = t^2_R - x^2_R[/tex], I have [tex]t^2_E - 3.98^2 = 0 - 19.6^2[/tex]. However, I end up getting the squareroot of a negative number. Can someone please show me where things went wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relativity Question (Twin Paradox)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Relativity Question Twin | Date |
---|---|

B Causality Question | Feb 23, 2018 |

I A question about the relativistic energy dispersion relation | Feb 20, 2018 |

I Where is light speed measured from? | Jan 19, 2018 |

B Special relativity equation question | Jan 8, 2018 |

Question regarding a twin paradox related example | Aug 20, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**