Hi everyone! I have a few questions regarding renormalization in QFT.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1. In Peskin chapter 10, he renormalizes [tex]\phi^4[/tex] theory using the renormalization conditions in equation (10.19), which basically say that the propagator has a pole at [tex]p^2=m^2[/tex] and that the 4-point interaction is exact for [tex]s=4m^2[/tex]. These are reasonable assumptions (I think). However, in equation (12.30) of chapter 12, he introduces a different set of renormalization conditions defined at a spacelike momentum. I.e. the propagator is defined at [tex]p^2=-M^2[/tex] and the four point function is defined at [tex]s=t=u=-M^2[/tex]. These are unphysical values, why are these renormalization conditions valid (or reasonable)? Why not use [tex]+M^2[/tex] and physically accessible conditions?

2. In chapter 12 section 4 he describes the renormalization of local operators. Is it correct to define a local operator as one that is roughly of the form [tex]\phi(x)^n[/tex]? In the diagrams for the Greens function with a local operator on page 431, the diagrams being summed have different numbers of legs! (Similar to page 601-603) I don't quite understand what's going on here and why these diagrams with different in/out states can be summed together.

3. In chapter 11, p. 355, why is it acceptable to use the "tadpole diagram = 0" renormalization condition in place of the usual one for the propagator? How is this equivalent to the propagator condition?

Thanks very much,

Flip

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Renormalization Conditions

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**