- #1

- 255

- 0

SL(2,C) group and they are responsible for Lorentz transformation of left and right

Weyl spinor.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter paweld
- Start date

- #1

- 255

- 0

SL(2,C) group and they are responsible for Lorentz transformation of left and right

Weyl spinor.

- #2

- 255

- 0

What's the difference between representation (1/2,1/2) and (1/2,0)+(0,1/2) of

SL(2,C)?

SL(2,C)?

- #3

- 13,033

- 588

One can also say that the photon transforms irreducibly wrt the SL(2,C) group, while the electron not.

- #4

- 255

- 0

look like. As far I know the representation (m,n) is (2m+1)(2n+1) dimensional so

these matricies should be also (2m+1)(2n+1) dimensional. In case of (1/2,1/2)

it gives 4x4 matricies which are probably somehow related to traditional matricies of

lorentz transformation of spacetime points. But on the other hand I heard that

the representation of SL(2,C) are derived from representation of SU(2) and the pair

(m,n) says probably that this representation of SL(2,C) is a tensor product (?) of

(2m+1)-dimensional and (2n+1)-dimnsional representation of SU(2). Does anyone know

the details?

- #5

- 13,033

- 588

Thanks. Do you happen to know how the matricies of general representation (m,n)

look like.

I don't know, but I can point you to the vast literature on this issue. Try one of Moshe Carmeli's books on group theory and General Relativity. The introduction treats SL(2,C) extensively.

As far I know the representation (m,n) is (2m+1)(2n+1) dimensional so

these matricies should be also (2m+1)(2n+1) dimensional. In case of (1/2,1/2)

it gives 4x4 matricies which are probably somehow related to traditional matricies of

lorentz transformation of spacetime points.

Absolutely correct.

But on the other hand I heard that

the representation of SL(2,C) are derived from representation of SU(2) and the pair

(m,n) says probably that this representation of SL(2,C) is a tensor product (?) of

(2m+1)-dimensional and (2n+1)-dimnsional representation of SU(2). Does anyone know

the details?

Willard Miller's book on group theory deals with the connection between SO(3), restricted Lorentz, SU(2) and SL(2,C) and the way the finite dim. of these Lie groups are related.

Share:

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K