- #1
alaspina
- 2
- 0
Hello,
I have an equation relating the angular acceleration (d2Θ/dt2) of an undamped system to a forcing function and the an angular term (Θ). The system in question is an inverted pendulum. I know that such an oscillating system can be represented by the following function:
The problem is that in the derivation, some of the terms in F(t) and L are coupled. This means that finding zeta, and omega n (the natural frequency) is not straightforward as I would have to rewrite the equation. My question is, if I solve the coupled function I have now for angular acceleration and angular displacement, then match the curve to the function above where zeta is 0 (undamped), can I then use the coefficients I have found to rewrite my system with the equation above and determine how it acts under different zeta values?
I'll rewrite this in terms of a step by step procedure;1) I have a function (not the one above) that relates angular acceleration to angular displacement and a forcing function. This function DOES NOT have an angular velocity term
2) I want to derive natural frequency from the function; the problem is that unlike the equation above, F(t), the forcing function is not multiplied by the factor L/I (where I is the natural frequency and L is a moment arm length)
3) I solve my function over a given time step for angular acceleration and displacement, and then match my solution to one that matches that of the above function for given values of omega n (I already know what the L and I should be)
4) Will it be mathematically correct to then represent the system with the damping term using the given omega n value I have found from matching the two solutions?
I have an equation relating the angular acceleration (d2Θ/dt2) of an undamped system to a forcing function and the an angular term (Θ). The system in question is an inverted pendulum. I know that such an oscillating system can be represented by the following function:
The problem is that in the derivation, some of the terms in F(t) and L are coupled. This means that finding zeta, and omega n (the natural frequency) is not straightforward as I would have to rewrite the equation. My question is, if I solve the coupled function I have now for angular acceleration and angular displacement, then match the curve to the function above where zeta is 0 (undamped), can I then use the coefficients I have found to rewrite my system with the equation above and determine how it acts under different zeta values?
I'll rewrite this in terms of a step by step procedure;1) I have a function (not the one above) that relates angular acceleration to angular displacement and a forcing function. This function DOES NOT have an angular velocity term
2) I want to derive natural frequency from the function; the problem is that unlike the equation above, F(t), the forcing function is not multiplied by the factor L/I (where I is the natural frequency and L is a moment arm length)
3) I solve my function over a given time step for angular acceleration and displacement, and then match my solution to one that matches that of the above function for given values of omega n (I already know what the L and I should be)
4) Will it be mathematically correct to then represent the system with the damping term using the given omega n value I have found from matching the two solutions?