Why? if they acquire properties outside the US then they should expect that to be a risk, it may be cheaper to build a factory in sudan, but if they built it in the us they would have US protection under the law. My problem is they expect the same protection in sudan.(hypithetical) and my other problem is that it's not all US business that recieves this benifit, it the ones that have bought and paid for their congressmen.
Do you have any support for that comment (my bold)?