Republican lies used to trick the public

  1. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,535
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A list of ongoing lies seems appropriate at this point. I will list my top six.

    1). The media is liberal

    Clinton was more than ample evidence that the media goes after anyone possible. They only seem liberal because the Republicans give them so much more to attack. This has been true for most of my life; going back to Nixon.

    2). Republicans are fiscal conservatives :rofl:
    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=90511

    3). Here is the lie that gets me the most: We are fighting the terrorists in Iraq.

    My uncle still thinks that Saddam attacked New York - this is the thinking that gives Republicans their power. We have the corrupt leading the blind.

    4). The price of oil is based solely on supply and demand

    This week investigations began as retail prices have outpaced wholesale prices by as much as 70%.

    5) We have been preparing for future terrorist attacks

    New Orleans proved that if anything, the Federal Gov response was inept, and the real protectors of homeland security - The National Guard - are short on equipment and unable to do their primary job of keeping Americans safe. Which leads us to the greatest lie of all

    6). The Republicans have acted responsibly to keep America safe.

    Not only are we clearly unprepared for large scale terror attacks at home, as was seen in New Orleans, also, the war in Iraq has had exactly the opposite effect of that claimed: The Bush administration has sacrificed homeland security for other agendas.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dude, you are un-American. I don't need to back that up with proof that you are wrong---I just have to say it for it to be true.

    [/sarcasm]
     
  4. russ_watters

    Staff: Mentor

    Some of those are just opinions being presented as facts, some are intentionally misleading or intentionally absolute, but several are actually facts that liberals just don't want to accept. For example, #3: That guy al Zar...something is a member of al Qaeda. He is a terrorist and we are fighting him in Iraq. Generally, that fact is intentionally obfuscated by liberals (ie, as it is in the OP), by mixing the why with the what. While it can't be said that we went to Iraq to fight al Qaeda, or that Saddam had something to do with 9/11 (as the OP points out), it is still a fact that we are now fighting terrorism by being in Iraq.

    #1 is self contradictory.

    #5 is also especially weak. It is a trivially obvious fact that the federal government has taken action to protect us from future terrorist attacks. #5 is the opinion that adequate preparations are not being taken, presented as a fact that no preparations have been made. I'm not a big fan of presenting opinions as facts, especially when they are so self-evidently factually wrong. It gives the impression of purposeful intent to mislead.
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2005
  5. russ_watters

    Staff: Mentor

    Faust, it is not unAmerican to disagree with the actions of our government, but intentional deception is wrong.
     
  6. Well, if something is so "...so self-evidently factually wrong." then you should be able to supply those facts to back your claim instead of simply stating it as fact when it is in fact opinion.

    Do you dispute the fact that the government's response to a large-scale disaster was lacking to say the least? Do you beilive the war in Iraq is keeping the fight over there? Just a couple of questions.
     
  7. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,553
    Gold Member

    1). The media is liberal - With exception of FOX News, which clearly follows a conservative agenda, the media is neither liberal or conservative but rather driven by ratings/profit and often inept all together.

    2). Republicans are fiscal conservatives - I'd like to know where the money went?! :grumpy:

    3). We are fighting the terrorists in Iraq - We are fighting some terrorists in Iraq now because of the invasion, but the invasion had nothing to do with terrorists initially. Good job Georgie.

    4). The price of oil is based solely on supply and demand - The goal of oil companies is like any other capitalist organization, and that is to maximize profit how ever they can.

    5) We have been preparing for future terrorist attacks - As I've said repeatedly, I always knew that was Bush*t if for not other reason than our open borders. Homeland Insecurity - see #2 above.

    6). The Republicans have acted responsibly to keep America safe - If Gore had become the president, as he should have, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now. Americans who support a more conservative (less activist-hah) Supreme Court should at least think on that one.
     
  8. edward

    edward 1,005
    Gold Member

    The so called liberal media is primarily owned by large conservative corporations. If the media is truly liberal, why would the conservative owners approve?? It is because in the guise of being liberal, the media can allow people like Karl Rove to still get their conservative propoganda to the people.
     
  9. I don't happen to think the media is liberal.

    NPR is touted as being one of the most liberal media outlets around. Listen to any of their talk shows - every view is balanced by someone from the other party.

    The listenership is liberal, because we demand balanced reporting. So the calls that are fielded, come from liberals by and large. But you can hardly call NPR liberal on the basis that I listen to it.
     
  10. BobG

    BobG 2,364
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    1). The media is liberal

    For the most part, there's a pretty good mix of liberal and conservative reporters in the media. I think there's slightly more liberal reporters in the media than conservative, so that may be kind of true, but at least way overblown.

    2). Republicans are fiscal conservatives :rofl:
    https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=90511

    Well, you got'em there. I've been pretty disappointed with the 'changes' brought by a Republican majority in Congress. (Of course, the obvious solution would be to vote Democratic next election - they've clearly mended their ways and will be much more fiscally conservative than they were back when they had a Democratic majority, right? :rolleyes: )

    3). Here is the lie that gets me the most: We are fighting the terrorists in Iraq.

    That's more a Bushism than a Republican line of thought. It is technically true, but very misleading. The terrorists we're fighting would be in Chechnya if they weren't in Iraq. I also have my doubts about al-Zaqawari being a true al-Qaeda loyalist. It sounds more like an alliance of convenience that might be a little problematic for both. I would think Bin Laden would be in favor of a Shi'ite theocracy - al-Zaqawari attacks the Shi'ites in hopes of sparking a civil war. He's a terrorist, none the less, even if he doesn't adhere to the al-Qaeda goals.

    4). The price of oil is based solely on supply and demand

    The price of oil is based on supply and demand. When the demand is high, the price stays high even when the costs are low. The investigation is about charging prices way above the costs - something that's only possible when retail demand is high. Most price gouging occurs as wholesale prices drop - refiners and retailers put off or slow the drop in prices as long as they can - they don't mind being followers when it comes to dropping prices and people are unlikely to complain enough to spark investigations when prices are dropping. Prices spiked almost momentarily, enough extra oil was put into the market to push the price back down - refineries raked in a big profit by the delay between the drop in wholesale prices and retail prices.

    5) We have been preparing for future terrorist attacks

    This is true. Preparing for terrorist attacks is hard work. We've been working hard. Here's a list of the exercises FEMA has taken part in (you have to scroll down a ways to the schedule). In 2004 and 2005 FEMA participated in a slew of exercises testing response to terrorist attack and participated in three exercises testing hurricane response - the purpose of two of the hurricane related exercises was to test FEMA's ability to respond to a terrorist attack that occurred during a hurricane.

    6). The Republicans have acted responsibly to keep America safe.

    If you discount Bush and some Bush loyalists, many Republicans have acted as responsibly as Democrats. A majority of Democrats voted to authorize the invasion, so it's not only Republicans that were duped by the Bush administration. Quite a few Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, would be a little hesitant to pull the troops out of Iraq today - it would be pretty irresponsible to create a disaster in Iraq and then leave it. Republicans like Chuck Hagel and Richard Lugar (both solidly conservative Republicans, by the way) have done as much to expose the gaps in Bush's pre-war rhetoric as any Democrat.
     
  11. Why can't we prevent terrorist attacks instead of having to clean up after them? Honestly...I just want to learn to fly the plane, not take off or land... :bugeye: HEH-LOW!!

    Your drivers ed instructor would not have let you take the class if you had no interest in the first and last part of the driving.

    I love my country but fear my government.
     
  12. BobG

    BobG 2,364
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Have you known many students in your life?

    My gradeschool daughter's tearful response to the 'help' I gave her on her spelling assignment: "I have to know how spell it, Dad! I don't have to know what it means!"

    An electrical engineering student's question to the instructor in a Circuit Analysis class after the first test was complete: "Will we have to remember what the colors on the resistors mean for the next test, too?" Response: "Um, yeah, that's pretty much something you'll have to remember for the rest of your life."

    Not a student, but someone in management asking about an orbital mechanics class designed for satellite operators (hoping to cut some time off the class): "Can't you teach this without the math?"

    I see nothing strange at all about a flying student only wanting to learn the 'easy' part of flying and hoping they could avoid having to deal with the tougher things like taking off and landing.
     
  13. I see your point Bob but I was referring to an adult who is seeking to actually be in control of a pressurised metal tube with live humans in it and several thousand gallons of flammable liquid going several hundred miles an hour through the air above our homes and businesses, not spelling a word or soldering electronics though they may also have serious implications too...I'm just sayin'...there should be a higher degree of "hell no, your not taking this class any more-edness" than what is commonplace at the local "want fries with that" certification rubberstamp place..thingy.

    Don't mind me too much, I'm on my 50th piece of nicorette today.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2005
  14. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,535
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Here is another one for the list: If you don't support the war in Iraq, you aren't supporting your troops or country. In other words, the only acceptable position for any loyal American is to be pro-war.

    What lie could be greater or more devious?
     
  15. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,535
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The statement was that prices have outpaced wholesale by 70%.

    You may remember back in the seventies, during the oil crisis, companies were caught dumping gasoline out in the desert. They have a long history of this.

    We saw how good of a job was done. And there was no terrorist attack to complicate matters.

    The Dems caved under the fervor for war generated by Bush and his gang, post 911. They were running scared because Bush's lies had been so effective. But I'm not saying that we should pull out now; no, now we're screwed. And you have the Republicans to thank for it for a very long time to come.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2005
  16. Before I removed myself from the Marines I would ask things like, "why are we doing that in that country?" or "why are you buying that?" and would be met with looks of complete bewilderment. If I asked why more than they could answer, I was given "other duties" to perform. I have about a zillion stories of how people with no sense are in charge of bands of crazed 18-20 years olds with guns and bombs, some funny, the majority not. Basically I wasted 11 years of my life.
     
  17. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,535
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Another one that I was reminded of that comes from the deep south. While in Arkansas I once engaged a hard right fundamentalist who was promoting war. I asked how he can be so pro-war when the bible is clear on the issue of killing.

    Apparently we have a new commandment: It's okay to kill, just not to murder.

    Edit: Of course, this also completely ignores the entire point of the new testament which is the basis for Christianity.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2005
  18. SOS2008

    SOS2008 1,553
    Gold Member

    What will it take for the truth to be the truth?

    In a counter rally ("Defenders of war in Iraq respond to large Saturday protest in Washington" Associated Press, Sept. 25, 2005) here is an excerpt with quotes from participants:
    "war on terrorism in Iraq" -- The stupid people who believe this keep repeating it (like another stupid person in the White House). Getting back to the media, they contribute to this by referring to the invasion of Iraq as "war on terror." The damn liberal media ( :rolleyes: ) is so infuriating. The article goes on:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9478262/

    Why do I suspect it is the "silent majority?" We know people still believe there were WMD and links to 9-11, but they aren't willing to go to the rally -- because someone might yell at them that they're stupid? I wish I could go to rallys like this and pass out copies of the 9-11 Commission Report to these people. Ah, what am I thinking--they would claim it's a conspiracy anyway. Lord save us all.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2005
  19. Wasn't it G Bush who said that the War in Iraq was to "Liberate the Iraqi People" bring them freedom...they were not then, under 'terrorist' attack, althought it would appear as such today, certainly the 'Under Attack' part.

    As for using lies, it's an old political trick.

    But the Propaganda campaigns, now that is telling, the recent History of Movies, and Stories, Glorifieing the Second World War, all adding to the Idea that wars are (somehow) "good" and Flying in the Face of the message that all of those vetrans try to expound, "Never Again!" apparently G. Bush Didn't, and isn't, listening to them.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2005
  20. Rabbits LOVE Freedom!

    In the very first post it says that: "The media is Liberal"

    from this page Defintion of the Word "Liberal"

    this piece reference:

    Middle English, generous, from Old French, from Latin lberlis, from lber, free. See leudh- in Indo-European Roots.]

    The Bold is mine, it says Free.

    The United States is supposed to be The Most Freedom Loving Country in the World, on the face of the Planet, and yet, if I say you live in a Liberal Country, saying your FREE, your insulted. US Politics.

    Your also not all that free, in certain respects.
     
  21. russ_watters

    Staff: Mentor

    faust9, the Homeland Security Department was created due to 9/11 for the purpose of defending against terrorism. You, of course, know that. That I have to state obvious facts is something that really annoys me about the politics forum here.
    No. I agree that planning for disaster relief was lacking. But that isn't what Ivan's point was in the OP. Or perhaps it was and perhaps the OP was just rhetoric (since he backed off with a later post), but the OP says nothing was done, not that what was done was inadequate. Here it is again:
    If that statement is a lie, then the truth would be that 'we have not been preparing for future terrorist attacks'. And you, of course, know that that is wrong (as, of course, does Ivan).

    Again, saying that nothing was done is trivially obviously factually wrong.

    The line about fighting terrorism in Iraq contains exactly the same type of misleading rhetoric. Very ironic in a thread supposedly about lies from the other side. :rolleyes:
    For the most part, yes.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?