Hello! Why do the singularities in the Residue Theorem must be isolated? If we have let's say a disk around ##z_0##, ##D_{[z_0,R]}## where all the points are singularities for a function ##f:G \to C## with the disk in region G, but f is holomorphic in ##G-D_{[z_0,R]}##, we can still write f as a Laurent series in ##G-D_{[z_0,R]}## and thus we still have ##\int_{\gamma}f(z)dz = 2\pi i c_{-1}##, with ##\gamma## a picewise, smooth, closed path in ##G-D_{[z_0,R]}##. I know that ##c_{-1}## is called residue only if the singularity is isolated, but letting aside the nomenclature, why can't we use the formula for non-isolated singularities?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Residue Theorem

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Residue Theorem | Date |
---|---|

A Dirac Delta and Residue Calculus | May 7, 2017 |

A Residue Proof of Fourier's Theorem Dirichlet Conditions | Jan 31, 2017 |

2nd order pole while computing residue in a complex integral | Apr 16, 2015 |

Confusion regarding Residue Theorem | Dec 20, 2012 |

Using the residue theorem to evaluate a real integral. | Sep 19, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**