Resonance in string

  • #1
528
33

Main Question or Discussion Point

according to book "....Let us look at a particular wave crest generated at the left end of the string by a fork. It travels to the right end of the string, is reflected back, and is reflected again at the fork.Now it interferes with the next wave...."
doubt: the fork keeps vibrating and keeps producing waves. so just after it is reflected from the right end, it will interfere with the next crest right? why didthe author assume the first crest travelled 2L distance without interference? wouldn't it interfere withe next frest just after it travels a distance L?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,847
1,644
The author is presenting a simplified picture. You should realize that all parts of the "incoming wave" interfere with all parts of the "reflected wave" to produce the wave you actually see.

The setup described is both driven and damped - but you don't have the maths for that yet.
 
  • #3
528
33
The author is presenting a simplified picture. You should realize that all parts of the "incoming wave" interfere with all parts of the "reflected wave" to produce the wave you actually see.

The setup described is both driven and damped - but you don't have the maths for that yet.
So the formula ##f=\frac{n}{2l}\sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}}## is wrong?
 
  • #4
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,847
1,644
Wrong for what purpose?
Context is everything.
 

Related Threads on Resonance in string

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
602
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
780
Replies
1
Views
430
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
1K
Top