Resonance Structures

  • Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date
  • #1
member 392791
Hello,

I am having difficulty discerning which resonance structures are considerable enough to include and which are so unimportant that they should be discarded. There seems to be no general rule on this that I can find, so I was wondering if such a rule existed or if someone can lead me in the right direction.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
member 392791
Thanks, that cleared a lot of things up (though they need to spell check and grammar check that article again)!!
 
  • #4
DrDu
Science Advisor
6,089
800
Rule number 5 is debatable. In general, two one electron bonds are more stable than one two-electron bond due to electronic repulsion.
Especially, what do they mean with their example?
How can structure 1 have 3 unpaired electrons? Either the electrons combine to total spin 1/2, then the molecule is already described by structures II and III, or the electrons combine to spin 3/2, then structure I corresponds to an excited state of the molecule which won't mix in structures II and III.
In the case of oxygen you also don't need molecular orbital considerations to show that triplet oxygen is more stable than singlet oxygen. Especially two three electron bonds are more stable than one two electron bond and one four electron bond. This was already shown in 1937 by Wheland and Lennard-Jones http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/1937/tf/tf9373301499
 

Related Threads on Resonance Structures

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top