While studying Jackson J.D. "Classical Electrodynamics" 3rd edition in chapter 14.1, page 663 he does something that I don't quite get it.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

He gets an expression for the retarded potencial and says that he can use the integral form of the 4-potencial to easily get an expression for the Maxwell tensor. Then he explains that he must do the derivative and that derivative must apply to both the [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\delta[/itex] function. All that I agree.

Then he applies the first derivation to the [itex]\theta[/itex] function and explains that it constrains the [itex]\delta[/itex] function and get [itex]\delta(-R^2)[/itex] so that term is only important when [itex]R=0[/itex]. I still agree.

But then he discards it saying it makes no contribution if one excludes the point [itex]R=0[/itex]...Why can he discard that point?

Thank you

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Retarded Fields

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Retarded Fields | Date |
---|---|

I Help to understand the Retarded Function | Nov 26, 2016 |

Retarded Green Function in Curved Spacetime | Sep 20, 2012 |

Time-retarded E-field and Gaussian surface integral | Feb 16, 2012 |

Calculation of an integral with retarded time | Dec 17, 2011 |

Advanced/Retarded Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates and Incident/Outgoing Wave | Mar 17, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**