Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In two dimensions I am under the impression that the ricci tensor or the scalar curvature equals the negative of the fundamental tensor and the sectional curvature (K).

I'd have written it out with the proper symbols but I am new to this forum and this isn't at least a complex question.

I know that the sectional curvature is directly proportional to the Riemannian Tensor, and since I am only talking about two dimensions, the only term that is independent and nonzero is R 1212. OK with the symmetries there are dependent terms that are the positive and negative of that but all of the multiplicities cancel out in the definition of K.

I was wondering if there where was anyone out there who can walk me or US through how this equation is true?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Ricci and K (curvature)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Ricci curvature | Date |
---|---|

I Covariant derivative of Ricci scalar causing me grief! | Nov 26, 2017 |

A On the dependence of the curvature tensor on the metric | Nov 2, 2017 |

I Ricci curvatures determine Riemann curvatures in 3-dimension | Nov 29, 2016 |

Curvature of a group manifold | Feb 11, 2016 |

Ricci curvature | May 22, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**