Edit: Am having a lot of trouble with the equations!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Hope this (“Analysis”) is the right forum for my question. I am studying the Plemelj-Sokhotskii (P-S) formulas and solutions to Riemann’s boundary value problem, using the bookBoundary Value Problemsby Gakhov. On p. 91 the homogeneous Riemann problem is stated as finding two functions, analytic on either side of a simple closed curve L, which satisfy at points t on the curve the relation

[tex]\Phi^+(t) = G(t) \Phi^-(t) [/tex]

Here + indicates the interior of L and – the exterior.

From here on I get confused. The next paragraph considers a particular type of this problem where the function undergoes a jump across L,

[tex]\Phi^+(t) - \Phi^-(t) = \varphi(t) [/tex]

where [tex]\varphi(t)[/tex] is a function defined only on L. This is the P-S formula having solution

[tex]\Phi(z) = {\frac{1}{2\pi i}} \int_L {\frac{\varphi(\tau)}{\tau-z}}{d\tau} [/tex].

Why list it with the homogeneous problem if it has a separate solution? Is there some relation that I'm not seeing?

In the next subsection Gakhov comes back to the homogeneous Riemann problem and on p. 93 considers the case where the index or winding number [tex]\chi[/tex] of G(t) is positive. He notes that

[tex]t^{-\chi}G(t)[/tex]

has zero index and may be written as

[tex]t^{-\chi}G(t) = \frac{e^{\Gamma^+(t)}}{e^{\Gamma^-(t)}}[/tex]

where

[tex]\Gamma(z) = {\frac{1}{2\pi i}} \int_L {\frac{ln[\tau^{-\chi}G(\tau)]}{\tau-z}}{d\tau} [/tex]

Where does this come from? I’m not seeing the equivalence (unless this is just a Cauchy integral, but then why go to the trouble of writing it like this? And wouldn't this require that G be analytic throughout both domains that are separated by L?)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Riemann Boundary Value Problem

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Riemann Boundary Value |
---|

I Video (analytic continuation) seems to mix 4-D & 2-D maps |

I N-th dimensional Riemann integral |

I Derivative of infinitesimal value |

A Integral of Dirac function from 0 to a... value |

I Values of Lagrange multipliers when adding new constraints |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**