[tex]\zeta (s)= \frac{1}{(1-2^{1-s})} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac {1}{(2^{n+1})} \sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k{n \choose k}(k+1)^{-s} [/tex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is the main problem with trying to prove the hypothesis algebraically boil down to the fact that s is an exponent to a "k" term? Would a derivation of the function that had no k terms to an exponent s, be at all helpful to an algebraic approach to the hypothesis?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Riemann zeta function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Riemann zeta function | Date |
---|---|

I'm trying to write a program that plots the riemann zeta function | Mar 26, 2013 |

About interesting convergence of Riemann Zeta Function | Dec 13, 2012 |

Riemann's zeta function fractal because of Voronin? | Dec 12, 2012 |

Help with Mobius Inversion in Riemann's Zeta Function by Edwards (J to Prime Pi) | Dec 28, 2011 |

Trivial zeros in the Riemann Zeta function | Oct 8, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**