Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Ring theory

  1. Aug 12, 2007 #1
    I don´t know how to solve it. Thanks beforehand

     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 12, 2007 #2

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    probably -1 should not be a square in K.
     
  4. Aug 12, 2007 #3

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The quartions are a degree 2 (non abelian) extension over the complex numbers:

    H=C[j] with the rule ij=-ji

    So, whether -1 is or is not a square is not important.

    I can't say I understand the question at all. The only thing you need, surely, is for k to be a subfield of the quaternions. Is the extension supposed to be finite? What does pruned mean?
     
  5. Aug 12, 2007 #4

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    well they are also a 4 dimensional extension of the reals generated by 1 and 3 square roots of -1, so i thought maybe he was trying to describe which property of the reals was needed?

    so if we just follow hamilton, we start from a field F and introduce 3 new elements i,j,k such that i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1, and set ij=k, jk=i. ki =j. ji=-k, kj=-i, ik=-j.

    then extend this linearly as a definition of multiplication on the vector space F^4 with vector basis 1,i,j,k. the question becomes i guess whether this is division ring or not? so i would look at the formula for the inverse of an element and see if it makes sense, or needs some assumptions on F?

    e.g. when defining the inverse of a complex number you need to divide by the sum of the squares of the coefficients, i.e. the ionverse of a+bi has denominator a^2 + b^2. so with a quaternion you seem to need that if 4 elements of your field are not all zero, then the sum of their squares is not zero. this requires e.g. that the field not admit a square root of -1.
     
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Ring theory
  1. Ring theory (Replies: 3)

  2. Ring theory (Replies: 11)

  3. Ring Theory Question (Replies: 2)

  4. Ring Theory Question (Replies: 1)

  5. Ring theory question (Replies: 6)

Loading...