Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Risk gametree

  1. Dec 18, 2014 #1
    My friend proposed to me this problem, as we were playing the boardgame RISK (rules written here http://www.hasbro.com/common/instruct/risk.pdf if you don't know em, I guess the relevant bit is really p10-11).

    Let's say I want to capture 2 territories, A and B, with 2 and 3 defending pieces on them respectively. I start off with 6 pieces in a country neighbouring both A and B. So, it's up to me my strategy: to capture A (2), then B (3), or the reverse. Will it make a difference (however small) to my probability of winning (succeeding in capturing both), which way I go?

    Gut instinct looking at the boardgame is "no", but instinct looking at the maths is "yes". On the other hand I don't have a clue how to calculate such probabilities quantitatively and I'm not expecting it (even calculating the outcome of a single battle seems tricky http://www4.stat.ncsu.edu/~jaosborn/research/RISK.pdf though we could probably use the results if we needed).

    I just want to know, if someone can suggest (and to some degree explain) from mathematical instinct, whether there will be a difference and if so which is the ideal path?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 18, 2014 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    You can use the table on page 5 to write down the full relevant game tree with probabilities for the first battle. It is not too large. Page 6 then gives the probabilities for the second battle.

    As different army sizes give different probabilities to win/lose individual rounds, I would expect a difference, but I don't know in which direction.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2014
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Risk gametree
  1. Risk curve (Replies: 0)

Loading...