Finding the Speed of a Wedge and Rod System

In summary: CM of the rod since the CM is not perpendicular to the face of the wedge. If I consider the upper end of the rod and the Center then the only useful information we have is the component of velocity of upper end perpendicular to the face of the wedge .The velocities of wedge and rod perpendicular to the contact surface should be same.So Vcos60=vcos30.
  • #36
TSny said:
Yes. From that you should be able to show that the velocity of the upper end of the rod has a component perpendicular to the wedge hypotenuse equal to Vcos(30), where V is the velocity of the wedge.
So s=dcos(30)

[itex]\frac{ds}{dt}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{ddcos(30)}{dt}[/itex]
As θ is not going to vary with time.
So [itex]\frac{ds}{dt}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{dd}{dt}[/itex]cos(30)

[itex]\frac{ds}{dt}[/itex]=Vcos(30).

Thank you TSny.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Tanya Sharma said:
##\hat{i}## to the right and ##\hat{j}## upwards .

## \vec{V}_C = \frac{M}{m}V\hat{i} + \frac{l}{2}ωcosθ\hat{j}##

## \vec{V}_{A/C} = \frac{l}{2}ωsinθ\hat{i} + \frac{l}{2}ωcosθ\hat{j}##

I was unable to understand how you find V[itex]_{C}[/itex]and V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]
I tried to understand your solution but it is a bit difficult.I tried this.
Let the rod rotate along CM
So,Vcosθ=lω/2
velocity of this component in y direction=lωcosθ/2
So V[itex]_{A}[/itex]=-MV/m##\hat{i}##-lωcosθ##\hat{j}##
Is it right?I also have some sign error. I am unable to find V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]?










-
 
  • #38
Satvik Pandey said:
I was unable to understand how you find V[itex]_{C}[/itex]and V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]
I tried to understand your solution but it is a bit difficult.I tried this.
Let the rod rotate along CM
So,Vcosθ=lω/2
velocity of this component in y direction=lωcosθ/2
So V[itex]_{A}[/itex]=-MV/m##\hat{i}##-lωcosθ##\hat{j}##
Is it right?I also have some sign error. I am unable to find V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]?-

pp4.png

Here is the figure.
 
  • #39
Satvik Pandey said:
I was unable to understand how you find V[itex]_{C}[/itex]and V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]
I tried to understand your solution but it is a bit difficult.I tried this.
Let the rod rotate along CM
So,Vcosθ=lω/2
velocity of this component in y direction=lωcosθ/2
So V[itex]_{A}[/itex]=-MV/m##\hat{i}##-lωcosθ##\hat{j}##
Is it right?I also have some sign error. I am unable to find V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]?

Your y component of V[itex]_{A}[/itex] looks correct if ω represents the magnitude of the angular velocity (i.e., a positive number). However, the x-component is not correct. The equation Vcosθ=lω/2 is also not correct.

We have the relative velocity formulas $$\vec{V}_A = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{A/C}$$ $$\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}$$ where A is the upper end of the rod, B is the lower end of the rod, and C is the center of mass of the rod. See the attached figure.

Can you express the magnitudes of ##\vec{V}_{A/C}## and ##\vec{V}_{B/C}## in terms of ##\omega##?
 

Attachments

  • Wedge rod 3.png
    Wedge rod 3.png
    5.5 KB · Views: 391
  • #40
TSny said:
Your y component of V[itex]_{A}[/itex] looks correct if ω represents the magnitude of the angular velocity (i.e., a positive number). However, the x-component is not correct. The equation Vcosθ=lω/2 is also not correct.

We have the relative velocity formulas $$\vec{V}_A = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{A/C}$$ $$\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}$$ where A is the upper end of the rod, B is the lower end of the rod, and C is the center of mass of the rod. See the attached figure.

Can you express the magnitudes of ##\vec{V}_{A/C}## and ##\vec{V}_{B/C}## in terms of ##\omega##?
If the rod rotates around the CM of the rod then by v=rω
V[itex]_{A/C}[/itex]=lω/2 (Considering CCW as +ve)
V[itex]_{B/C}[/itex]=-lω/2
But how can we say that directions of V_A/c and V_B/C are perpendicular to the rod(from figure in#39) ?
It seems to be correct but are there any proofs.
 
  • #41
Relative to C, all the points of the rod move in circles around C. The velocity of a point moving in a circle is tangent to the circle, and therefore perpendicular to the radius of the circle.

Yes, the magnitudes of ##V_{A/C}## and ##V_{B/C}## are each equal to ##l\omega/2##.

Can you express the x and y components of ##\vec{V}_{A/C}## and ##\vec{V}_{B/C}## in terms of ##l##, ##\omega## and ##\theta##?
 
  • #42
TSny said:
Relative to C, all the points of the rod move in circles around C. The velocity of a point moving in a circle is tangent to the circle, and therefore perpendicular to the radius of the circle.

OK got it.
THANK YOU FOR HELP.
 
  • #43
TSny said:
Relative to C, all the points of the rod move in circles around C. The velocity of a point moving in a circle is tangent to the circle, and therefore perpendicular to the radius of the circle.

Yes, the magnitudes of ##V_{A/C}## and ##V_{B/C}## are each equal to ##l\omega/2##.

Can you express the x and y components of ##\vec{V}_{A/C}## and ##\vec{V}_{B/C}## in terms of ##l##, ##\omega## and ##\theta##?

V_A/C=-lωsinθ/2 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-lωcosθ/2 [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
V_B/C=-lωsinθ/2 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-lωcosθ/2 [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

i hat +ve towards right and j hat +ve in upward direction.
 
  • #44
OK for ##\vec{V}_{A/C}##, but the signs are wrong for ##\vec{V}_{B/C}##. (I'm assuming ##\omega## is a positive number.)
 
  • #45
TSny said:
OK for ##\vec{V}_{A/C}##, but the signs are wrong for ##\vec{V}_{B/C}##. (I'm assuming ##\omega## is a positive number.)

Yes there should be +ve sign instead of -ve sign.

V[itex]_{B/C}[/itex]=lωsinθ/2 [itex]\hat{i}+lωcosθ/2\hat{j}[/itex]
 
  • #46
I tried to find V_C.
As V_C/B=V_C-V_B
V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=V[itex]_{C/B}[/itex]+V[itex]_{B}[/itex]

V[itex]_{C/B}[/itex]=-lωsinθ/2[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ/2[itex]\hat{j}[/itex].V[itex]_{B}[/itex]=MV/m [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]
Comb. these

V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=-lωsinθ/2[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ/2[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]+MV/m [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]
Is it right?:confused:
PPP5.png

I have considered ω here w.r.t axis passing through B.
Will it be same as ω w.r.t axis passing through C which I have used earlier?
 
Last edited:
  • #47
Satvik Pandey said:
V[itex]_{B}[/itex]=MV/m [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]

This equation isn't correct.

The idea is to use the energy equation to solve for the speed of the wedge, V. The energy equation contains V as well as the speed of the center of mass of the rod, VC, and the angular speed of the rod, ω. So, we need to express VC and ω in terms of V.

Using conservation of momentum in the x-direction, what can you deduce about the x component of ##\vec{V}_C##?

To get some information about the y-component of ##\vec{V}_C##, what do you get if you take the y-component of the equation ##\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}##?
 
  • #48
TSny said:
This equation isn't correct.

The idea is to use the energy equation to solve for the speed of the wedge, V. The energy equation contains V as well as the speed of the center of mass of the rod, VC, and the angular speed of the rod, ω. So, we need to express VC and ω in terms of V.

Using conservation of momentum in the x-direction, what can you deduce about the x component of ##\vec{V}_C##?

To get some information about the y-component of ##\vec{V}_C##, what do you get if you take the y-component of the equation ##\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}##?
THANK YOU TSny.
By conservation of momentum where v[itex]_{x}[/itex] is the velocity of CM (x-comp.)
MV=mv[itex]_{x}[/itex]

v[itex]_{x}[/itex]=MV/m

##\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}##
0=V[itex]_{C}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
Is it right?
 
Last edited:
  • #49
V_A=V_C+V_A/C

V_A={[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{-lωsinθ}{2}[/itex]}[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ/2[itex]\hat{j}[/itex].
Is it right?
What to do next?
 
  • #50
Satvik Pandey said:
THANK YOU TSny.
By conservation of momentum where v[itex]_{x}[/itex] is the velocity of CM (x-comp.)
MV=mv[itex]_{x}[/itex]

v[itex]_{x}[/itex]=MV/m

##\vec{V}_B = \vec{V}_C + \vec{V}_{B/C}##
0=V[itex]_{C}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
Is it right?

Looks good.
 
  • #51
TSny said:
Looks good.

What to do next?
 
  • #52
Satvik Pandey said:
V_A=V_C+V_A/C

V_A={[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{-lωsinθ}{2}[/itex]}[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ/2[itex]\hat{j}[/itex].
Is it right?
What to do next?

Looks like you have a sign error in the x component. For the y component of VA did you include both the y component of VC and the y component of VA/C?
 
  • #53
TSny said:
Looks like you have a sign error in the x component. For the y component of VA did you include both the y component of VC and the y component of VA/C?
{[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{lωsinθ}{2}[/itex]}[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ[itex]\hat{j}[/itex].
How is it?
What to do next?
THANK YOU for guiding me.
 
  • #54
Satvik Pandey said:
{[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{lωsinθ}{2}[/itex]}[itex]\hat{i}[/itex] -lωcosθ[itex]\hat{j}[/itex].

That looks right.

Note that if you can find a relation between ω and V, then you will be able to express the energy equation in terms of just V. So, you will be able to solve for V.

To get a relation between ω and V, you need to use a constraint condition that you have not yet used.

To avoid messy expressions, you might want to go ahead and substitute the known values for m, M, l, and θ and simplify as much as possible your expressions for VC and VA.
 
  • #55
TSny said:
That looks right.

Note that if you can find a relation between ω and V, then you will be able to express the energy equation in terms of just V. So, you will be able to solve for V.

To get a relation between ω and V, you need to use a constraint condition that you have not yet used.

To avoid messy expressions, you might want to go ahead and substitute the known values for m, M, l, and θ and simplify as much as possible your expressions for VC and VA.

On putting M=5kg,m=1kg,l=1m, θ=30 and I=ml[itex]^{2}[/itex]/12.
I got

[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{24}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

According to wedge constraint the velocities of wedge and rod perpendicular to the to the contact surface should be same.

Velocity of wedge perpendicular to the contact surface is Vcos30
Velocity of A perpendicular to the contact surface=[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]]cos150 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{24}[/itex]cos60[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]


Vcos30=-[itex]\frac{√3}{2}[/itex][5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{48}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

ppppppp6.png
.

Is it right?
 
  • #56
@Satvik :Which standard/class are you in ?
 
Last edited:
  • #57
Tanya Sharma said:
@Satvik :Which standard/class are you in ?
I am in class 10 now.
I think the foolish mistakes which I have made in this thread might have urged you to ask this.:rofl:
 
Last edited:
  • #58
Satvik Pandey said:
On putting M=5kg,m=1kg,l=1m, θ=30 and I=ml[itex]^{2}[/itex]/12.
I got

[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{24}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

According to wedge constraint the velocities of wedge and rod perpendicular to the to the contact surface should be same.

Velocity of wedge perpendicular to the contact surface is Vcos30
Velocity of A perpendicular to the contact surface=[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]]cos150 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{24}[/itex]cos60[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
Could you explain the above expressions ?
 
Last edited:
  • #59
Tanya Sharma said:
Could you explain the above expressions ?

I tried to find the velocity of upper part(part A) of rod perpendicular to the contact surface.
I resolved the rectangular component of V_A in the direction perpendicular to the contact surface and then I wrote them together.
Is it right?
 
  • #60
Satvik Pandey said:
On putting M=5kg,m=1kg,l=1m, θ=30 and I=ml[itex]^{2}[/itex]/12.
I got

[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{48}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{24}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

How did you use I=ml[itex]^{2}[/itex]/12 in the above expression ?
 
Last edited:
  • #61
Tanya Sharma said:
How did you use I=ml[itex]^{2}[/itex]/12 in the above expression ?


That was my mistake .It should be l(length of rod).Sorry:shy:
 
  • #62
Velocity of A perpendicular to the contact surface=[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]]cos150 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{2}[/itex]cos60[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
According to wedge constraint the velocities of wedge and rod perpendicular to the to the contact surface should be same.
So,
Vcos30=-[itex]\frac{√3}{2}[/itex][5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{4}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
Is it right?
 
Last edited:
  • #63
Satvik Pandey said:
Velocity of A perpendicular to the contact surface=[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]]cos150 [itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{2}[/itex]cos60[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
According to wedge constraint the velocities of wedge and rod perpendicular to the to the contact surface should be same.
So,
Vcos30=-[itex]\frac{√3}{2}[/itex][5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{4}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]
Is it right?

This is incorrect .The last equation doesn't even make any sense.
 
Last edited:
  • #64
I tried to use dot product approach in finding the component of V[itex]_{A}[/itex] perpendicular to the surface.
Unit vector perpendicular to the surface [itex]\vec{U}[/itex]=-[itex]\frac{√3}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex].


[itex]\vec{A}[/itex]=[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

Projection of A on U =[itex]\vec{A}[/itex].[itex]\vec{U}[/itex]/U

={[5V-[itex]\frac{ω}{4}[/itex]][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{√3 ω}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]}.{-[itex]\frac{√3}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]\hat{j}[/itex]}/1


=[itex]\frac{-5√3V}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{3√3}{8}[/itex]
But this is equal to Vcos(30)
So -20V+3ω=4V

Hence ω=8V.
Now
V[itex]_{C}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{MV}{m}[/itex][itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{lωcosθ}{2}[/itex] [itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

V[itex]_{c}[/itex]=√37 V

As
(mgl/2)(sin60° – sin30°) = (1/2)MV2+ (1/2)mv2+ (1/2)Iω2
On putting values-
[itex]\frac{3(√3-1)g}{2}[/itex]=142V^2

V=3(√3-1)/142

Now I think it is right. At last I found it.:rofl:
 
  • #65
Thank you TSny for guiding me.
And thank you Tanya Sharma for posting this question.
 
  • #66
Satvik Pandey said:
[itex]\frac{3(√3-1)g}{2}[/itex]=142V^2

GOT IT!

V=3(√3-1)/142

What happened to g and the factor of 2 in the denominator?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #67
TSny said:
GOT IT!
What happened to g and the factor of 2 in the denominator?
Sorry I missed that.My foolish mistakes continue.:cry:
V=15(√3-1)/142.
Are my other steps correct?
THANK YOU TSny for guiding me.You helped me a lot.:smile:
 
  • #68
Tanya mam I forgot to wish you "HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY".
Thank you.
 
  • #69
Satvik Pandey said:
V=15(√3-1)/142.
Are my other steps correct?

Yes, everything looks good to me.

Good work!
 
  • #70
TSny said:
Yes, everything looks good to me.

Good work!

It couldn't have been possible without your help.

:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
901
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top