How Does Friction Affect Ball Rolling on a Ramp?

Click For Summary
Friction plays a crucial role in the rolling motion of a ball on a ramp, particularly on the left side where it opposes the ball's motion and causes it to roll. The friction force on the left side acts up the slope, opposing the ball's downward motion, while on the right side, friction is negligible, resulting in no opposing force. As a result, the ball rolls while slipping on the right side, as there is no friction to maintain rolling without slipping. The torque necessary for rolling is generated by the friction on the left side, while gravity alone does not create torque about the center of mass. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the difference in motion between the two sides of the ramp.
twiztidmxcn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
In the figure below, a ball is let go from rest at the point shown on the ramp. The region on the left side of the ramp has friction; on the right side, the friction is negligible.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y7/twiztidmxcn/RollingFig1.gif

Theres the picture. It won't upload because apparently its too big.

A) What force causes the torque around the center of mass to make the ball roll while going down?

B) Which direction is the friction force on the ball while on the left side of the ramp? (if no friction say zero)

C) Which direction is friction force on the ball on the right side of the ramp? (if none say zero)

(D) Is the ball still rolling without slipping on the right side of the ramp? If so, explain what force is giving the right torque about the center of mass to make it roll; if it is not rolling, then explain what is different between the left and right side that makes it not roll on the right side.

I've gotten part way with what I think is right but any help would be appreciated, as I am still a bit foggy on rolling object concepts.

For A, I put the force that causes the torque and thus causes rolling is the frictional force of the left side. The ball is let go and it starts to move and begins to roll due to friction opposing the forward motion. I do, however, have this suspicion that the force of gravity may in fact play a much bigger role because if let go, the force of gravity pulls down on the center of mass and causes a torque force.

For B, I said that on the left side, the friction force is directed towards the right, this being due to the fact that the ball is moving right and wanting to slip to the left (spinning around the axis), and since friction opposes slipping the friction will be in the opposite direction of where the ball wants to slip, so friction is directed the same way as the ball's motion.

For C, there is no friction due to the fact that friction can be neglected.

For D, I said that the ball is now rolling while slipping because there is no friction to oppose the slipping. However, the question confuses me because it asks whether the ball is rolling without slipping or not rolling at all. Does this mean that the ball is just slipping but not rolling or what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twiztidmxcn said:
For A, I put the force that causes the torque and thus causes rolling is the frictional force of the left side. The ball is let go and it starts to move and begins to roll due to friction opposing the forward motion. I do, however, have this suspicion that the force of gravity may in fact play a much bigger role because if let go, the force of gravity pulls down on the center of mass and causes a torque force.
Forget about your suspicion & go with your first answer. Since the net effect of gravity is acting AT the center of mass, it obviously can't exert a torque ABOUT the center of mass which is what would be needed to cause rotation. The rotation is caused by the friction, as you said.
twiztidmxcn said:
For B, I said that on the left side, the friction force is directed towards the right, this being due to the fact that the ball is moving right and wanting to slip to the left (spinning around the axis), and since friction opposes slipping the friction will be in the opposite direction of where the ball wants to slip, so friction is directed the same way as the ball's motion.
This contradicts your answer for part A, and is wrong. The ball is moving down the slope towards the right. Friction ALWAYS acts in the direction opposite to the motion. Therefore the friction is acting tangentially to the ball, up the slope towards the left, and this causes the ball to rotate clockwise.
twiztidmxcn said:
For C, there is no friction due to the fact that friction can be neglected.
Correct.
twiztidmxcn said:
For D, I said that the ball is now rolling while slipping because there is no friction to oppose the slipping.
Correct. On the right side, NO force is causing it to rotate. Instead, it's rotating because there is no force to STOP its rotation. However, its translational motion (up the slope) is slowing due to gravity, and so it is rotating FASTER than it would if it were "rolling without slipping" (and in the absence of friction, it will continue to rotate clockwise at a constant angular velocity, even after it stops moving up the slope and starts slipping back down). So your answer, "rolling while slipping" is correct.
 
thank you kindly my friend, that helped clear things up a lot
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...