Rolling Resistance vs Speed

In summary: Question: Do you assume rolling without slipping?Polyurethane on Masonite sounds slippery to me.This is a good question. If you are rolling without slipping, then the rolling resistance would be zero. If you are slipping, then the rolling resistance would be greater. I would think that slipping would be more likely on a surface like this, where there is some give. Please do share your test results with us so we can check how it went. Thanks.Yes. Experiment is the final say on anything.Polyurethane on Masonite sounds slippery to me.If you are rolling without slipping, then the rolling resistance would be zero. If you
  • #1
e2m2a
354
11
I have conducted an experiment which involves measurements of the velocities of a carriage moving in a straight line which has 4 polyurethane caster wheels attached to it. (The kind you can get a hardware store.) In one phase of the test the carriage is pushed at about .1 meters per second. In the second phase the carriage is pushed about .3 meters per second. The carriage is rolling over a level smooth surface of Masonite. The mass of the carriage including the wheels is 2.3 kg.

My question is will the rolling resistance between the wheels and the Masonite be significantly different when the carriage is rolling at .1 meters per second vs rolling at .3 meters per second or would the rolling resistance be pretty much the same at both speeds?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
At those speeds and with this type of wheel, you can assume the rolling resistance to be independent of speed. Only the normal force will matter.
 
  • #3
Jack's probably right. But if you're doing the experiment, I'd have thought you'd find out. Experiment trumps assumptions. If you need to assume speed doesn't matter, by all means do so. If your experiment can measure any difference, why assume?
 
  • #4
Question: Do you assume rolling without slipping? Polyurethane on masonite sounds slippery to me. Here is what I understand by rolling resistance.
 
  • #5
e2m2a said:
4 polyurethane caster wheels
e2m2a said:
the rolling resistance between the wheels and the Masonite
IMO, there is very little rolling resistance due to the interface between the wheels and the Masonite floor. Both are hard and do not deform much (unless your load is crazy heavy). The "rolling resistance" will be mostly bearing friction in the wheels, IMO, and should not vary much with velocity. Please do share your test results with us so we can check how it went. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Leo Liu
  • #6
e2m2a said:
4 polyurethane caster wheels attached to it. (The kind you can get a hardware store.)
e2m2a said:
In one phase of the test the carriage is pushed at about .1 meters per second. In the second phase the carriage is pushed about .3 meters per second.
BTW, were these caster wheels free to yaw from side-to-side, or were they fixed in the direction of movement? If they can yaw, then the rolling resistance can change with velocity due to oscillations in the direction that they are pointing as you push the cart. Just think of a shopping cart with one bad front wheel caster... :wink:
 
  • #7
jack action said:
At those speeds and with this type of wheel, you can assume the rolling resistance to be independent of speed. Only the normal force will matter.
Thanks for your answer.
 
  • #8
Merlin3189 said:
Jack's probably right. But if you're doing the experiment, I'd have thought you'd find out. Experiment trumps assumptions. If you need to assume speed doesn't matter, by all means do so. If your experiment can measure any difference, why assume?
Yes. Experiment is the final say on anything.
 
  • #9
berkeman said:
BTW, were these caster wheels free to yaw from side-to-side, or were they fixed in the direction of movement? If they can yaw, then the rolling resistance can change with velocity due to oscillations in the direction that they are pointing as you push the cart. Just think of a shopping cart with one bad front wheel caster... :wink:
Thanks for your answer. The carriage moved in a straight line. The wheels were the stationary kind. No wobbling.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #10
berkeman said:
IMO, there is very little rolling resistance due to the interface between the wheels and the Masonite floor. Both are hard and do not deform much (unless your load is crazy heavy). The "rolling resistance" will be mostly bearing friction in the wheels, IMO, and should not vary much with velocity. Please do share your test results with us so we can check how it went. Thanks.
Someday I might be able to share the full test results on this site.
 
  • #11
e2m2a said:
My question is will the rolling resistance between the wheels and the Masonite be significantly different when the carriage is rolling at .1 meters per second vs rolling at .3 meters per second
Something that you may actually be able to measure is the amount of distortion that the load causes to the wheels. The particular material combination may make it hard to do but measuring the amount by which the axle drops when the load is applied may be possible, using a camera or a sensitive micrometer perhaps. The amount of drop is the equivalent of the wheel going uphill by that amount each rotation and a lot of that energy could be lost (depending on the hysteresis, which could also be measured). The Power lost in that way would be proportional to the speed. Soft car tyres get much hotter because of this distortion effect.

It has been suggested, above, that you should experiment as much as possible and this could be worth considering.

Rolling resistance on railway tracks: I saw a travel programme on the TV last week about a long, rural railway line in Sri Lanka. They showed a guy walking the line, oiling it with a mop (every day?) on the grounds that it reduced corrosion, wear on the bends and resistance. It made me wonder if it was actually necessary (keeping someone employed, perhaps) or why that couldn't be done by all trains as they went along the track. The tiniest spray of oil would cost very little. I had never heard of this practice anywhere else,
 

1. What is rolling resistance?

Rolling resistance is the force that opposes the motion of a rolling object, such as a tire on a road. It is caused by the deformation of the tire and the friction between the tire and the road surface.

2. How does rolling resistance affect speed?

The higher the rolling resistance, the more force is required to maintain a certain speed. This means that as rolling resistance increases, the speed of the rolling object will decrease.

3. What factors affect rolling resistance?

The main factors that affect rolling resistance are the type of surface the object is rolling on, the material and design of the object's tires or wheels, and the weight and shape of the object itself.

4. How does speed affect rolling resistance?

As speed increases, rolling resistance also increases. This is because at higher speeds, there is more deformation of the tire and more friction between the tire and the road surface, resulting in a higher resistance force.

5. How can rolling resistance be reduced?

Rolling resistance can be reduced by using tires with lower rolling resistance, maintaining proper tire pressure, and choosing smoother road surfaces. Additionally, reducing the weight and aerodynamic drag of the rolling object can also help to decrease rolling resistance.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
987
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top