Proving the Algebraic Nature of Root 3 + Root 2 Using Polynomial Expressions"

  • Thread starter lokisapocalypse
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Root
In summary, the square of \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} is algebraic because it satisfies the equation: x^4-10x^2+ 1.
  • #1
lokisapocalypse
32
0
I need to show that this is an algebraic number.

In other words,

I need to show: an*x^n + an1*x^(n-1) + ... + a1 * x^1 + a0 * x^0 =
where the a terms are not ALL 0 but some of them can be.

Like for root 2 by itself,

I have 1 * (root 2) ^ 2 + 0 * (root 2)^1 + -2 * (root 2) ^ 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How about a5=1, a3=-10, a1=1, all others zero?
 
  • #3
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.
 
  • #4
let [tex]x = \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}[/tex]

then [tex](x - \sqrt{3})^2 = x^2 - 2\sqrt{3}x + 3 = 2[/tex]

... something like that. put one square root one one side & the rest on the other, square both sides, etc etc then you'll get a 4th-degree polynomial that has [tex]\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}[/tex] as a root. end of proof
 
  • #5
lokisapocalypse said:
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.

Rounding error.

--J
 
  • #6
The easiest way is just to find an equation with integral coefficients that has the number as a root.

What is the square of [tex]\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}[/tex] ? Express that in the form : integer plus a square root. Let's call this [tex]n_1 = a + \sqrt{b}[/tex]

Next, find the conjugate of the number. [tex]n_2 = a - \sqrt{b}[/tex]

Set up the equation [tex](y - n_1)(y - n_2) = 0[/tex] and expand it out. You know for certain that this equation is going to have integral coefficients because that's a property of conjugate surds.

Once you have that equation in y, just put [tex]x^2 = y[/tex] and get a quartic in x. That equation will have [tex]\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}[/tex] as one of the roots, and you're done.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
You can look at this from the standpoint of Galois theory. Along with one surd we are going to get the conjugate of: [tex]\pm\sqrt2[/tex]. So putting both roots in a quadratic makes the coefficients rational. [tex]x^2-2=0[/tex].

The same idea can be applied to this expression: [tex]\pm\sqrt{2}[/tex][tex]\pm\sqrt{3}[/tex]. We don't want the surds to appear in the coefficients.

Maybe not as efficient as described in previous postings, but does offer some insight.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.

It shouldn't; Maple is capable of doing symbolic arithmetic. Don't ask it to approximate. :tongue2:

By the way, please don't multiple post. :mad:
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Standard method: Use the fact that (a+ b)(a- b)= a2- b2 to get rid of the square roots.
[tex](x- \sqrt{3}-\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{3}+ \sqrt{2})= (x- \sqrt{3})^2- 2= x^2- 2\sqrt{3}x+1[/tex]

[tex](x^2+1-2\sqrt{3}x)(x^2+1+2\sqrt{3}x)= (x^2+1)^2- 12x^2= x^4+ 2x^2+ 1- 12x^2= x^4- 10x^2+ 1[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{3}+ \sqrt{2}[/tex]
is algebraic because it satisfies
[tex]x^4-10x^2+ 1[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
You made a typo in there somewhere.
 
  • #11
I apologize for the multiple post...I was in a panic. Won't happen again.
 
  • #12
Hurkyl said:
You made a typo in there somewhere.

Yep, I dropped an "x" early on. I've edited it. Thanks, Hurkyl.
 
  • #13
Wow, I hope I never have to do these kind of problems. What course is this for?
 
  • #14
adc85 said:
Wow, I hope I never have to do these kind of problems. What course is this for?

Modern Algebra course of some kind. I'm doing a similar one myself this semester. Actually, I solved that very exercise a couple of hours ago.

Very nice course, by the way. Don't hope without knowing. :wink:
 

1. What is "Root 3 + root 2"?

"Root 3 + root 2" is an expression that represents the sum of the square roots of 3 and 2. It can also be written as √3 + √2.

2. Is "Root 3 + root 2" a rational or irrational number?

"Root 3 + root 2" is an irrational number. This means that it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers and its decimal representation is non-terminating and non-repeating.

3. What is the approximate value of "Root 3 + root 2"?

The approximate value of "Root 3 + root 2" is 3.14626436994. However, it is an irrational number, so its decimal representation is infinite and non-repeating.

4. How can "Root 3 + root 2" be simplified?

Unfortunately, "Root 3 + root 2" cannot be simplified any further. It is already in its simplest form and cannot be written as a rational number.

5. What is the relationship between "Root 3 + root 2" and the Pythagorean theorem?

"Root 3 + root 2" is related to the Pythagorean theorem, which states that in a right triangle, the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. In this case, "Root 3 + root 2" is equal to the length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle with sides of length 1 and 2.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Math POTW for Secondary and High School Students
Replies
5
Views
969
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
460
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
769
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
256
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
826
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top