Rotation operator of spin

  • #1
cristianbahena
16
1
for compute:
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}S_x e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, if we use $$S_x=(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)] e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, why that is equal to $$(\frac{\hbar}{2})[\frac{i\phi}{2}|+><-|\frac{i\phi}{2}+\frac{-i\phi}{2}|-><+|\frac{-i\phi}{2}]$$

??
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,765
295
for compute:
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}S_x e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, if we use $$S_x=(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)] e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, why that is equal to $$(\frac{\hbar}{2})[e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}|+><-|\frac{i\phi}{2}+\frac{-i\phi}{2}|-><+|\frac{-i\phi}{2}]$$

??
Are you sure you typed the last expression correctly?
 
  • #3
cristianbahena
16
1
Are you sure you typed the last expression correctly?
thanks! now it is correct
 
  • #4
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,765
295
Ok. But this is strange, I would expect exponentials of ##i\phi/2## instead of just factors of ## i \phi/2##. You are sure there are no exponentials in the final result??
 
  • #5
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
21,089
11,972
Of course there should be exponentials since the ##|\pm \rangle## kets are eigenvectors or ##\hat{S}_z##, that's very easy to see in the notation given in the OP.
 
  • #6
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,765
295
Of course there should be exponentials since the ##|\pm \rangle## kets are eigenvectors or ##\hat{S}_z##, that's very easy to see in the notation given in the OP.
Indeed. I was trying to lead the OP to the answer without giving it away too quickly :-)
 
  • #7
cristianbahena
16
1
Ok. But this is strange, I would expect exponentials of ##i\phi/2## instead of just factors of ## i \phi/2##. You are sure there are no exponentials in the final result??

sorry!

for compute:
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}S_
x e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, if we use $$S_x=(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)] e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, why that is equal to $$(\frac{\hbar}{2})[e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}|+><-|e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}+e^{\frac{-i\phi}{2}}|-><+|e^{\frac{-i\phi}{2}}]$$

??
 
  • #8
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,765
295
sorry!

for compute:
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}S_
x e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, if we use $$S_x=(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$
$$e^{\frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}(\frac{\hbar}{2})[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)] e^{\frac{-iS_z\phi}{\hbar}}$$
so, why that is equal to $$(\frac{\hbar}{2})[e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}|+><-|e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}+e^{\frac{-i\phi}{2}}|-><+|e^{\frac{-i\phi}{2}}]$$

??
Good, now we are talking!

The next step is this: do you know what we get if we apply ##S_z## to ##|+ \rangle ## ?

The next question is: do you know what we get if we apply ##e^{ S_z} ## ti ## |+ \rangle ##?
(I did not include the factors of ##i\phi/\hbar## for now, we can put them back at the next step).
 
  • #9
cristianbahena
16
1
Good, now we are talking!

The next step is this: do you know what we get if we apply ##S_z## to ##|+ \rangle ## ?

The next question is: do you know what we get if we apply ##e^{ S_z} ## ti ## |+ \rangle ##?
(I did not include the factors of ##i\phi/\hbar## for now, we can put them back at the next step).

i know that
$$S_z |+ >= \frac{\hbar}{2} |+ >$$

also $$ D_z(\phi)= 1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\phi$$ operator of infinitesimal rotations, if we apply this operator $$n$$ times:

$$ (D_z(\phi))^n= (1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n$$ in the limit $$ lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(D_z(\phi))^n= lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n=e^{ \frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}} $$
im not sure why $$n$$ is pressent in $$\frac{\phi}{n}$$ when apply n-times operator D
so
i think that:
we have

$$D_z(\phi)|+ >=1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\phi|+>=(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})|+>$$
then

$$(D_z(\phi))^n|+ >=(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n|+>=(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})^n|+>$$
in the limit:
$$lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(D_z(\phi))^n|+ >=lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n|+>=lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})^n|+>=e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}|+>$$


but also

$$S_z$$ is the generator of rotations so i f we apply $$S_z$$ to $$|+>$$ know the new ket was just rotated $$\phi^{'}$$, so the new ket is $$e^{i\phi^{'}}|+>$$ how i know that $$\phi^{'}= \phi$$?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,765
295
i know that
$$S_z |+ >= \frac{\hbar}{2} |+ >$$

also $$ D_z(\phi)= 1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\phi$$ operator of infinitesimal rotations, if we apply this operator $$n$$ times:

$$ (D_z(\phi))^n= (1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n$$ in the limit $$ lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(D_z(\phi))^n= lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n=e^{ \frac{iS_z\phi}{\hbar}} $$
im not sure why $$n$$ is pressent in $$\frac{\phi}{n}$$ when apply n-times operator D
so
i think that:
we have

$$D_z(\phi)|+ >=1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\phi|+>=(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})|+>$$
then

$$(D_z(\phi))^n|+ >=(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n|+>=(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})^n|+>$$
in the limit:
$$lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(D_z(\phi))^n|+ >=lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+i\frac{S_z}{\hbar}\frac{\phi}{n})^n|+>=lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}(1+\frac{i\phi}{2})^n|+>=e^{\frac{i\phi}{2}}|+>$$
Good work. That's all you need to answer the problem

but also

$$S_z$$ is the generator of rotations so i f we apply $$S_z$$ to $$|+>$$ know the new ket was just rotated $$\phi^{'}$$, so the new ket is $$e^{i\phi^{'}}|+>$$ how i know that $$\phi^{'}= \phi$$?
When we say that Sz is the generator of rotation, we do NOT mean that applying Sz will rotate the state. We mean that the exponential of ## i S \theta /\hbar ## will rotate the state by an angle ##\theta##. This was you showed above, with an angle ##\phi/2##.
 
  • #11
cristianbahena
16
1
Good work. That's all you need to answer the problem

When we say that Sz is the generator of rotation, we do NOT mean that applying Sz will rotate the state. We mean that the exponential of ## i S \theta /\hbar ## will rotate the state by an angle ##\theta##. This was you showed above, with an angle ##\phi/2##.
Good! Thanks
 

Suggested for: Rotation operator of spin

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
829
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
988
Top