Rotation operators

  • Thread starter cragar
  • Start date
  • #1
cragar
2,552
3

Homework Statement


Determine the matrix representation of the rotation operator
[itex] R(\phi k) [/itex] using the states |+z> and |-z> as a basis. Using your matrix representation verify that [itex] R^{\dagger}R=1 [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I need to write [itex] R| \psi> [/itex] in terms of a matrix.
If I have [itex] |\psi>=a|+z>+b|-z> [/itex]
Then do I just operate R on [itex] \psi [/itex] and then write this in terms of a matrix.
are these related to the Pauli spin matrices
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,515
2,159

Homework Statement


Determine the matrix representation of the rotation operator
[itex] R(\phi k) [/itex] using the states |+z> and |-z> as a basis. Using your matrix representation verify that [itex] R^{\dagger}R=1 [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I need to write [itex] R| \psi> [/itex] in terms of a matrix.
If I have [itex] |\psi>=a|+z>+b|-z> [/itex]
Then do I just operate R on [itex] \psi [/itex] and then write this in terms of a matrix.
I'm not sure exactly what you had in mind, but it's probably not the most straightforward way to solve this problem.
are these related to the Pauli spin matrices
Yes. Remember that the spin operators ##\hat{S}_x##, ##\hat{S}_y##, and ##\hat{S}_z## are generators of rotations. (This is definitely covered in your textbook.) Use that fact to calculate R.
 
  • #3
cragar
2,552
3
ok thanks for your help. My book gives the matrix for R and it is in the z basis.
And I took [itex] R^{\dagger}R [/itex] and it equaled one. But If the matrix wasn't in the
z basis would I use the roatation matrix to get the answer.
I would take [itex] S^{\dagger}RS [/itex] and this would give the correct R for the problem.
 
  • #4
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,515
2,159
I don't understand what you're asking. Well, I sorta do, but I'd like you to clarify your question. What is S? How did you find S?
 
  • #5
cragar
2,552
3
[itex] s= \[left (begin{array}{cc}<+z|+x>& <+z|-x>\\ <-z|+x>& <-z|-x> \end{array}\right)\][/itex]
where the bras are what basis I am going to and the kets are the basis that I was in. I don't really know how S is derived though
 
Last edited:
  • #6
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,515
2,159
Yes, that's the regular method you use to change bases. You're doing the same thing you learned in linear algebra. It's just the notation that's different.
 

Suggested for: Rotation operators

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
952
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top