So, How to Find x - Rod Standing on Frictionless Table (Rotation)

In summary, a rod of length l is standing on a frictionless surface and given a slight impulse to start falling. In order to find the torque, angular acceleration, angular velocity, normal force, and sliding distance, the laws of conservation of energy and equations of moments of forces can be applied. The total kinetic energy of the rod, which is the sum of translational and rotational kinetic energy, can be used to find the relation between linear and angular velocity. The center of mass of the rod falls straight down due to the lack of horizontal force, and its position can be determined using the equation y_cm = l/2 * cos(theta). Finally, a relation between angular acceleration and beta can be found, as the path of the rod
  • #1
FedEx
318
0
A rod standing on frictionless table(Rotation)

Homework Statement


A rod of length l is standing on a friction less surface.
A slight impulse is given to the rod and hence the rod starts falling. Find the torque,angular acceleration ,angular velocity, the normal force by the ground and the distance through which the end part of the rod slides on the ground when the rod makes an angle of [tex]\theta[/tex] withe the vertical


Homework Equations



Law of conservation of energy and equations of moment of forces.

The Attempt at a Solution



We can apply the laws of conservation of energy

[tex] mgh = mg\frac{l}{2}(1-cos\theta) + something [/tex]

I don't know what this something would be. It may be the sum of the rotational energy and something. It can't just be rotational energy cause the rod is also sliding on the surface.

From this we would get angular velocity. Differentiating it would give us angular acceleration. Now we can apply the equation of moments. Let x be the distance by which the rod slides.

[tex]N\frac{l}{2}cos\theta = I\alpha [/tex]

The above is about the centra of mass.

[tex]Mg\frac{l}2}sin\theta = I_{0}\beta[/tex]

The above is about the point which touches the ground(ie the endpoint)

What we have to do is to find a relation between alpha and beta and the acc which we get from the law of conservation of energy.

Moreover these are just three equations while we have four variables ( alpha, beta, N and x) and we have no equation containing x.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In the first and second equation the h and the x should not be there. I am trying to edit but vain
 
  • #3


FedEx said:
We can apply the laws of conservation of energy

[tex] mgh = mg\frac{l}{2}(1-cos\theta) + something [/tex]

I don't know what this something would be. It may be the sum of the rotational energy and something. It can't just be rotational energy cause the rod is also sliding on the surface.
The total KE of the rod.

Hint: What path does the center of mass take?
 
  • #4


Doc Al said:
The total KE of the rod.

Hint: What path does the center of mass take?
Does total mean rotational + translational. If yes than what would be the relation between linear velocity and angular velocity. I don't think that it would be
[tex] v = \frac{l}{2}\omega[/tex]

The path should be a parabola. But still that is not helpful. Let's suppose that initially the co ordinate of the endpoint of the rod is (0,0) then the position of the centre of the mass of the rod once it becomes horizontal would be less than l/2 cause the rod would have slided a certain distance in the -ve x direction.

though i can apply

[tex] \frac{l}{2} - x = vt[/tex]

[tex]\frac{l}{2} = \frac{1}{2}gt^{2}[/tex]

Hence

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}(\frac{l}{2} - x) = v_{x}[/tex]

And what else can i apply?

Please help.

We have obtained the above equation but we have also added a variable (ie V_x)

We definately assume V_x to be constant

Now at [tex]\theta[/tex]

[tex]v_y = \sqrt{2gh}[/tex]

[tex] h = \frac{l}{2} - xtan\theta - \frac{l}{2}cos\theta + x(cosec\theta)(cos\theta) [/tex]

This is weird.
 
  • #5


FedEx said:
Does total mean rotational + translational.
Yes. Translational KE of the center of mass plus rotational KE about the center of mass.
If yes than what would be the relation between linear velocity and angular velocity. I don't think that it would be
[tex] v = \frac{l}{2}\omega[/tex]
Use a bit of geometry. Find the position of the rod's center as a function of angle.

The path should be a parabola.
No, it's simpler than that. Hint: Consider the forces acting on the rod.
 
  • #6
Then there is just one way left. A straight line. And in that case then the center of mass finally would be at (0,0).

I can definately apply geometry once i know the point about which i have to take the velocities. I have done various problems but not the ones in which the point about which the object is rotating is sliding.

Just elaborate a few important points eg how to determine x at a certain angle, the relation between [tex] \alpha & \beta[/tex]
 
  • #7
FedEx said:
Then there is just one way left. A straight line. And in that case then the center of mass finally would be at (0,0).
Right. The center of mass falls straight down since there is no horizontal force on the rod.
I can definately apply geometry once i know the point about which i have to take the velocities. I have done various problems but not the ones in which the point about which the object is rotating is sliding.

Just elaborate a few important points eg how to determine x at a certain angle, the relation between [tex] \alpha & \beta[/tex]
What's the relationship between the position of the center of mass and the angle of the rod?
 
  • #8
[tex] y_{cm} = \frac{l}{2}cos\theta[/tex]

Yup that's better. Now a final relation between alpha and beta is needed. But as you have said that the path is a straight line i feel that alpha and beta are the same.

I must say thing. The way you help people is ingenious. Thats because you help in such a way that one feels thayt he or she has done the problem on his own. Cause you do not give direct solutions but you give deep insights. Its like " Dont offer a fish to the hungry, but teach him how to fish"
 
  • #9
Hey Doc

You have really helped me in this problem. And i am about to finish it only if you could just comment on my last post.
 
  • #10
FedEx said:
[tex] y_{cm} = \frac{l}{2}cos\theta[/tex]
Good.
Yup that's better. Now a final relation between alpha and beta is needed. But as you have said that the path is a straight line i feel that alpha and beta are the same.
What do you mean by "alpha" and "beta"?

I must say thing. The way you help people is ingenious. Thats because you help in such a way that one feels thayt he or she has done the problem on his own. Cause you do not give direct solutions but you give deep insights. Its like " Dont offer a fish to the hungry, but teach him how to fish"
Thank you. There is a method to my madness. :wink:
 
  • #11


OK, I see how you use alpha and beta. They are the same.
FedEx said:
[tex]N\frac{l}{2}cos\theta = I\alpha [/tex]

The above is about the centra of mass.
This is OK.

[tex]Mg\frac{l}2}sin\theta = I_{0}\beta[/tex]

The above is about the point which touches the ground(ie the endpoint)
This relationship is not necessarily true. The point of contact accelerates.
 
  • #12
The point of contact accelerates. Let's say instead of beta we use

[tex]
Mg\frac{l}2}sin\theta = I_{0}\sqrt{{\beta}^2 + ({\alpha}\frac{l}{2})^2 - 2{\beta}{\alpha}{\frac{l}{2}}cos{\theta}} [/tex]
 
  • #13


FedEx said:
[tex]N\frac{l}{2}cos\theta = I\alpha [/tex]

The above is about the centra of mass.
That should be sinθ, not cosθ.
FedEx said:
The point of contact accelerates. Let's say instead of beta we use

[tex]
Mg\frac{l}2}sin\theta = I_{0}\sqrt{{\beta}^2 + ({\alpha}\frac{l}{2})^2 - 2{\beta}{\alpha}{\frac{l}{2}}cos{\theta}} [/tex]
Why not just forget about that point? The torque about the center of mass is the one you need.
 
  • #14
Bingo.

Forget the end point. In the first post i have written 3 equations forget the last one.

Now instead of something we can use

[tex] \frac{1}{2}I(\omega)^2 + \frac{1}{2}m(2g)(cos\theta)\frac{l}{2} [/tex]

And we will diff it so that we will get an equation in alpha.

Now we have got 3 variables and 3 equations. Sum solved.

Thank you.
 

1. How do I find the value of x in a given equation?

To find the value of x in an equation, you can use algebraic techniques such as isolating the variable, using the distributive property, and solving for x using inverse operations. You can also use graphing or numerical methods to find the approximate value of x.

2. What are some common strategies for solving for x?

Some common strategies for solving for x include simplifying the equation by combining like terms, isolating the variable on one side of the equation, and using the commutative and associative properties to rearrange the equation. You can also use substitution, elimination, or substitution to solve for x in a system of equations.

3. How do I solve for x when there are multiple variables in an equation?

If there are multiple variables in an equation, first try to isolate the variable you are solving for. If this is not possible, you may need to use substitution to eliminate one variable or use a system of equations to solve for multiple variables simultaneously. You may also need to use logarithms, exponents, or other advanced techniques to solve for x.

4. Are there any common mistakes to avoid when solving for x?

One common mistake when solving for x is forgetting to perform the same operation on both sides of the equation, which can throw off the balance and lead to an incorrect solution. Another mistake is not properly distributing negative signs or fractions. It is important to carefully check your work and make sure all steps are logical and accurate.

5. How do I check my solution for x?

To check your solution for x, simply substitute the value you found back into the original equation. If the equation is true when the value is substituted, then you have found the correct solution for x. You can also graph the equation and see if the point corresponding to your solution lies on the graph.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
217
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
803
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
864
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
3K
Back
Top