Rotational Motion and velocity

In summary, when an inelastic uniform sphere of radius 'a' slides without rotation on a smooth horizontal plane and impinges on a thin horizontal rod at a height 'b' from the plane, the maximum velocity for it to just roll over the rod is (2gb)^0.5, independent of 'a'. However, there is also a constraint for b, where b < 7a/17 and the minimum value of the normal force must be greater than 0. Additionally, the angular speed at any time after the collision must be less than or equal to the initial angular speed.
  • #1
zorro
1,384
0

Homework Statement



An inelastic uniform sphere of radius 'a' is sliding without rotation on a smooth horizontal plane when it impinges on a thin horizontal rod at right angles to its direction of motion and at a height 'b' from the plane. Find the maximum velocity so that it will just roll over the rod.


The Attempt at a Solution



Let the initial velocity of the sphere be v and its final angular velocity be ω

By conservation of angular momentum about the corner point,
mv(a-b) = 7/5 ma2ω

By conservation of energy,

0.5mv2 = mgb + 0.5*7/5*ma2ω2

On solving, I got

gif.latex?v=&space;a\sqrt{\frac{14gb}{7a^{2}-5(a-b)^{2}}}.gif


which is incorrect :(
Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi Abdul! :smile:
Abdul Quadeer said:
An inelastic uniform sphere of radius 'a' is sliding without rotation on a smooth horizontal plane when it impinges on a thin horizontal rod at right angles to its direction of motion and at a height 'b' from the plane. Find the maximum velocity so that it will just roll over the rod.

By conservation of angular momentum about the corner point,
mv(a-b) = 7/5 ma2ω

I don't understand this …

the weight will have a torque so why would angular momentum be conserved? :confused:

And if it "just" rolls over, won't ω be taken as 0?
 
  • #3
The torque due to weight becomes an internal torque if you consider the Earth and the sphere to be your system. The net internal torques add to zero.

It just rolls over means that it just starts rolling without slipping motion (as opposed to earlier slipping motion)
 
  • #4
Abdul Quadeer said:
The torque due to weight becomes an internal torque if you consider the Earth and the sphere to be your system. The net internal torques add to zero.

You can't do that! …

you need to find the motion of the sphere relative to the Earth!
It just rolls over means that it just starts rolling without slipping motion (as opposed to earlier slipping motion)

Ah, I see what you mean …

no not in this case …

there are sometimes questions about things slipping and then starting rolling (but still moving of course), but this question is envisaging the sphere hitting the step, immediately starting to roll up onto the step, and finally juuuuust making it, at zero speed (and zero angular speed)! :wink:
 
  • #5
tiny-tim said:
You can't do that! …

you need to find the motion of the sphere relative to the Earth!

The velocity 'v' is relative to the earth.

tiny-tim said:
Ah, I see what you mean …

no not in this case …

there are sometimes questions about things slipping and then starting rolling (but still moving of course), but this question is envisaging the sphere hitting the step, immediately starting to roll up onto the step, and finally juuuuust making it, at zero speed (and zero angular speed)! :wink:

eh? in that case the solution will be too simple.
v will be (2gb)^0.5, independent of 'a'.
 
  • #6
Hi Abdul! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
Abdul Quadeer said:
v will be (2gb)^0.5, independent of 'a'.

I think that's right. :wink:
 
  • #7
Sorry that is incorrect.
 
  • #8
There is nothing wrong with the angular momentum conservation equation. The wrong part lies in the energy conservation equation. Since the collision is inelastic, energy before collision < energy after collision. However, when the sphere climbs up (after collision), energy is conserved:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}.\frac{7}{5}ma^2\omega_0 ^2=mgb[/tex]
where [tex]\omega _0[/tex] is the initial angular speed right after the collision.

There is also a constraint for b. Look at the result, one can tell that a>b is the condition. However, that is not enough. We should also notice that, in order to perform rotation about the rod, the sphere must have ENOUGH centripetal force. Since the force by the rod is outwards, this makes things harder:
[tex]F_{centripetal}=mg\frac{a-b}{a}-N[/tex]
where N is the radial component of the force by the rod. We also have:
[tex]F_{centripetal} = m\omega ^2a[/tex]
Therefore:
[tex]\omega ^2 a = g\frac{a-b}{a}-\frac{N}{m}[/tex]
We must have the above equation satisfied at all time after the collision. Try to find the condition :wink:
 
  • #9
hikaru1221 said:
… Since the collision is inelastic…

hi hikaru1221! :smile:

thanks, i hadn't noticed that :redface:

the step is a sudden obstacle, not a gradual slope, so energy isn't conserved at the moment of collision :rolleyes:

sorry, Abdul! :blushing:
 
  • #10
hikaru1221 said:
There is also a constraint for b. Look at the result, one can tell that a>b is the condition. However, that is not enough. We should also notice that, in order to perform rotation about the rod, the sphere must have ENOUGH centripetal force. Since the force by the rod is outwards, this makes things harder:
[tex]F_{centripetal}=mg\frac{a-b}{a}-N[/tex]
where N is the radial component of the force by the rod. We also have:
[tex]F_{centripetal} = m\omega ^2a[/tex]
Therefore:
[tex]\omega ^2 a = g\frac{a-b}{a}-\frac{N}{m}[/tex]
We must have the above equation satisfied at all time after the collision. Try to find the condition :wink:

That condition is that the minimum value of the normal force is greater than 0 :wink:
b < 7a/17
Thank you very much!

tiny-tim said:
thanks, i hadn't noticed that :redface:

No problem. Even I didnot notice that :biggrin:
 
  • #11
There is also another condition. Notice that [tex]\omega[/tex] I wrote in that equation is not [tex]\omega _0[/tex]; it is angular speed at ANY TIME after collision.
 
  • #12
Oh so you mean ω <= ωo ?
 
  • #13
Yep.
Seems too obvious, right? For harder problems, you would never see such obvious things; at those times, you have to come back to the foundation of the condition :wink:
 
  • #14
hi hikaru1221! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :wink:)
hikaru1221 said:
There is also another condition. Notice that [tex]\omega[/tex] I wrote in that equation is not [tex]\omega _0[/tex]; it is angular speed at ANY TIME after collision.

but ω will decrease after the collision, so the only effective constraint is on ω0.
 
  • #15
tiny-tim said:
but ω will decrease after the collision, so the only effective constraint is on ω0.

Yes, of course it is, but just for this specific problem. I just want to remind Abdul to keep in mind the fundamental before proceeding. He's practicing for important exams, so it's better for him not to let go of any mark :wink: And should he face harder problems in the exams and the condition is not so obvious, he should also go back to the fundamental. Exam can test candidates' thinking at any point.
 

1. What is rotational motion?

Rotational motion is the movement of an object around an axis or center point. It is a type of motion that occurs when an object rotates or spins on its own axis.

2. How is angular velocity different from linear velocity?

Angular velocity refers to the rate of change of angular displacement, while linear velocity refers to the rate of change of linear displacement. In other words, angular velocity measures how fast an object is rotating, while linear velocity measures how fast an object is moving in a straight line.

3. What is the relationship between rotational motion and torque?

Torque is a force that causes rotational motion. The greater the torque applied to an object, the greater the rotation produced. In turn, the amount of rotation depends on the size and direction of the torque.

4. How does angular acceleration affect rotational motion?

Angular acceleration is the rate of change of angular velocity. It describes how fast an object's rotational speed is changing. The greater the angular acceleration, the faster the object will rotate.

5. What is the difference between centripetal force and centrifugal force?

Centripetal force is a force that acts towards the center of an object's circular motion, keeping it in its circular path. On the other hand, centrifugal force is a fictitious force that appears to act away from the center and is a result of inertia. It is important to note that centrifugal force does not actually exist, but is rather a perceived force due to an object's tendency to continue moving in a straight line instead of following a curved path.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
420
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
987
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
334
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
699
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
10
Replies
335
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
998
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top