Round trip to earth in a straight line?

In summary, the conversation discussed the concept of traveling in a straight line and returning to Earth. It was determined that this would only be possible if the universe had positive curvature, which is currently not known. The conversation also touched on the idea of higher dimensions and how they may affect our perception of space-time. Ultimately, due to the expansion of space, it is unlikely that anyone could ever return to their point of origin, making the universe seem infinitely large. The role of light and its finite speed in this concept was also briefly mentioned.
  • #1
kasse
384
1
I talked to an astronomy student recently, and he told me that if I travel out from Earth in a straight line, I will finally return to earth. Is this true?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
That would only be true if the universe had curvature, current studies show that the universe is completely flat.
 
  • #3
Well, he told me that it is bent in higher dimensions. Much in the same way as a imagined 2D-creature wouldn't understand why he comes back to the samt point after walking round earth.
 
  • #4
It is, in fact, not known whether the total curvature of the universe is positive, which is what would give that result (The Earth does, in fact, have positive curvature). If this person told you that would result because the universe is "bent in higher dimensions" he didn't know what he was talking about! There are some string theories that require higher dimensions and it is thought that we don't "notice" them because they are "curled" up- imagine a 2 dimensional paper rolled up into a very, very, tight cylinder: it now looks like it is one-dimensional.

However, that has nothing to do with what would happen if we were walking (or flying in a space ship) in a "regular" dimension that we do notice!
 
  • #5
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?
 
  • #6
kasse said:
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?

The contrary is true, if the universe has NO curvature, it's impossible to travel in a straight line and return to Earth.

We'll use a 2D analogue: A basketball. The surface of the basketball is a 2D space with positive curvature. Traveling in a straight line from a point along the surface of the ball will eventually lead back to that same point. Now take that same basketball and flatten it. Now there's no way to return to the origin by traveling in a straight line.
 
  • #7
kasse said:
But if the universe has a curvature, it will be practically impossible to travel in a straight line and return to earth, no?
That is correct, there are no straight lines in a curved space-time.
The thing that comes closest is a so-called geodesic.

But even then it is not automatically true that if you travel away from A along a geodesic you will meet A again, even if space-time has a positive curvature.

HallsofIvy said:
If this person told you that would result because the universe is "bent in higher dimensions" he didn't know what he was talking about!
I would not go that far in saying that.
While it is custom to describe curved space-time as intrinsic curvature, it would not be impossible to embed it in a higher dimension.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
The universe is expanding too rapidly for any traveller to return to their point of 'origin', irrespective of curvature.
 
  • #9
Chronos said:
The universe is expanding too rapidly for any traveller to return to their point of 'origin', irrespective of curvature.

Yes, indeed.

By the way, do the researchers know more about whether the universe is flat or if it will start to contract or just continue to expand? I remember from high school that my physics book said we would probably never know.
 
  • #10
MeJennifer said:
That is correct, there are no straight lines in a curved space-time.
The thing that comes closest is a so-called geodesic.

But even then it is not automatically true that if you travel away from A along a geodesic you will meet A again, even if space-time has a positive curvature.


I would not go that far in saying that.
While it is custom to describe curved space-time as intrinsic curvature, it would not be impossible to embed it in a higher dimension.
You are right. I had interpreted "bent in higher dimensions" as meaning "curled up in some dimensions". I think your interpretation as "embedded in higher dimensions" it better.
 
  • #11
kasse said:
I talked to an astronomy student recently, and he told me that if I travel out from Earth in a straight line, I will finally return to earth. Is this true?

This can quite definitely be ruled out, because of the expansion of space.

Even when sending out a light signal, it can never catch up with the drift of space at large, because of the space expansion.

So, ultimately, this has the effect of that in all respects, the universe can best be seen as infinitely large.
 
  • #12
heusdens said:
This can quite definitely be ruled out, because of the expansion of space.

Even when sending out a light signal, it can never catch up with the drift of space at large, because of the space expansion.

So, ultimately, this has the effect of that in all respects, the universe can best be seen as infinitely large.


But if light had infinite speed, would it then "return" to Earth after beeing sent out?
 
  • #13
Unknown. But, since light has a finite [and fairly well measured speed], the question is moot.
 

1. How long does it take to travel round trip to Earth in a straight line?

The exact time it takes to travel a round trip to Earth in a straight line depends on the speed of the spacecraft and the distance between the starting point and Earth. However, with current technology, it would take approximately 8 months to travel to Mars and back to Earth in a straight line.

2. What is the shortest distance between Earth and another planet for a round trip in a straight line?

The shortest distance between Earth and another planet for a round trip in a straight line is approximately 54.6 million kilometers, which is the distance between Earth and Mars at their closest approach. This distance can vary depending on the position of the planets in their respective orbits.

3. Can a round trip to Earth in a straight line be done without stopping?

With current technology, it is not possible to travel a round trip to Earth in a straight line without stopping. Spacecrafts would need to refuel and resupply along the way, and the human body is not equipped to withstand such a long journey without breaks for rest and nourishment.

4. What are the potential risks of a round trip to Earth in a straight line?

The potential risks of a round trip to Earth in a straight line include exposure to radiation and other hazards of space travel, such as microgravity and isolation. There is also a risk of technical malfunctions or human error during the journey, which could have serious consequences.

5. How does traveling in a straight line differ from traditional orbital trajectories?

Traveling in a straight line to Earth would require a much more powerful spacecraft and advanced navigational systems compared to traditional orbital trajectories. The spacecraft would also need to be able to withstand the intense pressure and heat of entering and exiting Earth's atmosphere at high speeds.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
733
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
680
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
85
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top