In the forward to rovelli's new book "Quantum Gravity", james bjorken states quite plainly that the effective field theory approach to quantum gravity correctly taught us that GR must be viewed as just an effective field theory, and in fact this is the universally shared view.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The problem for lqg is that the central construct in lqg, spin networks, only makes sense if GR is in fact exactly correct. I don't see why it would make sense for an author to allow a forward to be written by someone else, that contradicts the basic premise of the book.

In fact, rovelli defends lqg by stating...

"But the modification of the notions of space and time has to do with the diffeomorphism invariance and the background independence of the action, not with it's specific form."

In other words, it is inaccurate to view lqg as a genuine candidate quantum gravity theory, and thus as a rival of string theory. Rather, lqg is just a toy theory serving as a laboratory to explore a small number of fundamental issues in quantum gravity.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Rovelli in his new book admits lqg not correct, but still interesting in certain ways

Loading...

Similar Threads for Rovelli book admits | Date |
---|---|

The 'time oriented coarse graining' hypothesis -- "Rovelli" | Jul 20, 2014 |

Another short question on Rovelli's book | Jul 29, 2010 |

Question about QG :books-Rovelli's in particular | Jan 16, 2008 |

The Carlo Rovelli book on loop quantum gravity | Mar 21, 2006 |

Rovelli book's out | Oct 23, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**