1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rule 30 and The Golden Ratio

  1. Dec 17, 2012 #1
    I was messing around with cellular automata and wanted to test a theory i had.

    If you look close at the elementary cellular automata Rule 30 you'll notice that the right
    side is chaotic, while the left side has chaotic properties but it does have order and
    repetition.

    There is an imaginary line that you could draw that separates the two sides that slopes
    slightly to the left.

    My theory was that the ratio of the right side and the left side of each row follows closely to
    the Golden Ratio.

    I've attached an image of the first 10,000 iterations of Rule 30 and overlaid a red line that
    represents the golden ratio dividing line (not the actual dividing line). You should see that
    for a while up at the top the golden ratio line and the actual separation point match up
    almost perfectly. But eventually they start to separate.

    Is this just a coincidence? Or is there something to this?

    1000 Iterations
    8283395272_bf875e2fe8_b.jpg

    10,000 Iterations
    8283355398_f4835efdf0_k.jpg
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 19, 2012 #2
    You see yourself, that the line doesn't match any more after 6000 iterations or so.
     
  4. Dec 19, 2012 #3

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Looks like every line of cells parallel to the left edge eventually settles into a repeating pattern. Maybe you could extract the distance (from right edge) to the start of the repeats and the length of the repeat, and plot those against distance from left edge.
     
  5. Dec 19, 2012 #4
    One observation: I tried altering randomly the center cell of each row (all cells directly below the initial black cell) after each iteration; while the patterns on both sides change, there is always regularity on the left side of the triangle, and the divisory 'line' invariably appears at the same place. Altering the center cell to be not random, but constantly black or constantly white, also leaves the 'line' at the same place. (Presumably the line is the effect of the fixed white area beyond the left border of the triangle, as propagated inwards by the rule.)
     
  6. Dec 20, 2012 #5
    If it helps, here are two graphs close to wht haruspex was asking. The first is the ratio you look for, the second is the length of the repeating pattern on the diagonals parallel to the left border. Both as a function of vertical distance from the top. Constructed by the method haruspex outlined: detecting the moment when the repeating pattern (of lines parallel to the left border) breaks.

    attachment.php?attachmentid=54120&stc=1&d=1356026215.png attachment.php?attachmentid=54121&stc=1&d=1356026215.png
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Dec 20, 2012 #6

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Thanks Dodo, that's intriguing. It looks like all repeats are length sixteen (some just happening to consist of a repeated pattern of some shorter length). That sounds like something that should be provable.
     
  8. Dec 23, 2012 #7
    Intriguing results.
    As an architect and designer I've been following the relationships between CAs and the Golden Ratio since my student dissertations back in London at the Computer Science and Engineering faculty of the University of Westminster in the mid-90s.

    I speculated then that there was a likely relationship between the "sensitively dependant" CA regimes on the "edge of chaos" and the Golden Ratio, which I now develop on in the following blog: http://asynsis.wordpress.com

    Asynsis is a neologism meaning "asymmetrical creation"
    (more on http://www.quora.com/Asynsis).

    I believe that Conway, Langton, Kauffman, Bak and Wolfram are all on the same
    track when they describe CAs in this transitional domain.
    That the "edge of chaos" regime is the most creative and persistent for
    a very simple, elegant reason - one that links a law of beauty with one of optimisation.

    There is a believe, also a strong link with the new universal Constructal design law of nature and culture as well, where nature evolves to flow currents of energy, matter and information more easily, with greater power over time. The geometrical signature of these behaviours can also be expressed as the Golden Ratio iterated over time. In the Asynsis blog, I also cite a 2006 proof of my further speculation that the Golden Ratio, or Phi for short is imbedded in the Feigenbaum diagram or Logistic map of bifurcations modelling systems expressing both chaotic and ordered regimes.
    So what we have is a new classical-scale theory of everything based on the geometric constant of Phi, where nature self-organises itself and builds complexity in numerous permutations that can be traced back to the Golden Ratio - the archetypal fractal.
    We begin to see how nature allows design to emerge analogically and optimally from entropy.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Rule 30 and The Golden Ratio
  1. The golden ratio (Replies: 11)

  2. Golden Ratio (Replies: 11)

  3. Golden Ratio (Replies: 2)

  4. The Golden Ratio? (Replies: 3)

Loading...