In "Concepts of Modern Physics", 4th ed., Arthur Beiser obtains the following Rutherford formula(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

N[\theta ] =

\frac

{

\left( \frac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0} \right)^2

\left( n d Z^2 \right)

N_0

}

{

T^2 \left( r^2 \sin ^4 \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) \right)

}

[/tex]

relating the number of alpha particles detected per unit area to the angle of scattering [tex]\theta[/tex]. Here, d is the thickness of the foil, n is the number of gold atoms per unit volume, T is the kinetic energy of the alpha particles, r is the distance target-screen and [tex]N_0[/tex] is the total number of alpha particles that strike the foil during the experiment.

The number of particles per unit area around the direction at an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the sin of [tex]\frac{\theta}{2}[/tex].

My problem is that I don't understand why [tex]N\left(\theta\right)[/tex] diverges when [tex]\theta[/tex] goes to 0. Shouldn't I get a finite number, smaller than [tex]N_0[/tex], of particles per unit area ?

What am I missing?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Rutherford Formula

Loading...

Similar Threads - Rutherford Formula | Date |
---|---|

I How to calculate particle size from a peak list? | Apr 14, 2017 |

Nucleus at the center? | Feb 1, 2016 |

How did Rutherford know? | Apr 25, 2009 |

Rutherford atom model | Apr 25, 2009 |

Rutherford's analysis | Aug 30, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**