# Rutherford Formula

#### SredniVashtar

In "Concepts of Modern Physics", 4th ed., Arthur Beiser obtains the following Rutherford formula

$$N[\theta ] = \frac { \left( \frac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0} \right)^2 \left( n d Z^2 \right) N_0 } { T^2 \left( r^2 \sin ^4 \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) \right) }$$

relating the number of alpha particles detected per unit area to the angle of scattering $$\theta$$. Here, d is the thickness of the foil, n is the number of gold atoms per unit volume, T is the kinetic energy of the alpha particles, r is the distance target-screen and $$N_0$$ is the total number of alpha particles that strike the foil during the experiment.
The number of particles per unit area around the direction at an angle $$\theta$$ is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the sin of $$\frac{\theta}{2}$$.

My problem is that I don't understand why $$N\left(\theta\right)$$ diverges when $$\theta$$ goes to 0. Shouldn't I get a finite number, smaller than $$N_0$$, of particles per unit area ?
What am I missing?

Related Atomic and Condensed Matter News on Phys.org

#### SredniVashtar

Ok, I guess I was missing the shape of the area associated with the angle $$\theta$$.

### Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving