Rutherford Formula

In "Concepts of Modern Physics", 4th ed., Arthur Beiser obtains the following Rutherford formula

[tex]
N[\theta ] =
\frac
{
\left( \frac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0} \right)^2
\left( n d Z^2 \right)
N_0
}
{
T^2 \left( r^2 \sin ^4 \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) \right)
}
[/tex]

relating the number of alpha particles detected per unit area to the angle of scattering [tex]\theta[/tex]. Here, d is the thickness of the foil, n is the number of gold atoms per unit volume, T is the kinetic energy of the alpha particles, r is the distance target-screen and [tex]N_0[/tex] is the total number of alpha particles that strike the foil during the experiment.
The number of particles per unit area around the direction at an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the sin of [tex]\frac{\theta}{2}[/tex].

My problem is that I don't understand why [tex]N\left(\theta\right)[/tex] diverges when [tex]\theta[/tex] goes to 0. Shouldn't I get a finite number, smaller than [tex]N_0[/tex], of particles per unit area ?
What am I missing?
 
Ok, I guess I was missing the shape of the area associated with the angle [tex]\theta[/tex].
 

Related Threads for: Rutherford Formula

  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top