Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sagnac effect- the maths

  1. Jul 4, 2004 #1
    in this webpage: http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm we have an explanation to the saganc effect and in page 2 and 3 i got stumbled:
    i cant get to the quadratic equation in page 3 i.e:
    [c^2-R^2*w^2*cos(theta)]*T^2+-[2R^2*w*sin(theta)]*T-2R^2[1-cos(thata)]=0
    from this:
    c^2*T^2=2R^2*[1-cos(w*T)*cos(theta)+-sin(wT)sin(theta)]
    in page 2.

    i tried to use limits because in the paper the said that w*T is extremely small, but what i got is
    c^2*T^2=2R^2*[1-cos(theta)]
    (i took limits to both the sin and cos functions with w*T as the angle), but as you see it doesnt match, then what have idone wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 5, 2004 #2
  4. Jul 5, 2004 #3
    for those too much lazy or dont understnad the equations i wrote here they are in the attachment.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2006
  5. Jul 5, 2004 #4
    sorry but the other picture is too much big (anyway you can see it in the link i first gave :eek: i know :yuck: ).
     
  6. Jul 5, 2004 #5

    DW

    User Avatar

    Its just math. Perhaps no one cares, but why assume no one knows? That is "your" speculation. Try again, but this time as it said, keep powers of omega*T up to second order, NOT JUST FIRST ORDER.
     
  7. Jul 5, 2004 #6

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    w is the angular velocity of the device and T is the time required for the light pulse to travel from one mirror to the other in the foward and reverse direction. w*T therefore is a measure of distance, not angle. You need to plug in the radius of the ring to derive the angle of rotation, which is microscopic.
     
  8. Jul 6, 2004 #7
    i hoped that with asking: "no one knows?" some users will be incentived to answer, anyway i dont understand neither your answer nor chronos answer.
    when you mean omega*T up to second order do you mean that the deravartive of the cos and sin of w*t will be of 2degree?

    and to chronos when you multiply omega with T you get the unit of rad which can be translated to degrees with which you measure the length of the arc.
    anyway chronos, when you mean the radius of the ring are you reffering to capital R in this paper?
     
  9. Jul 6, 2004 #8

    DW

    User Avatar

    No, I mean that you have to carry out the taylor series expansion of the cos function to second order in omega*t, not just to first. The sin function's second order term is zero so even though you are really to carry them both out to second order be sure to pick up the second order term from the cos expantion.
    In other words use:
    [tex]sin(\omega T) \approx \omega T[/tex]
    and
    [tex]cos(\omega T) \approx 1 - \frac{\omega ^{2}T^{2}}{2}[/tex]
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2004
  10. Jul 6, 2004 #9
    now that's more clear, thanks.
     
  11. Feb 22, 2010 #10
    can anyone answer this question
    In Sagnac interferometer replace the beam splitter by a fourth mirror and calculate how many loops around the interferometer can the light make before its intensity is reduced by 99% ?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Sagnac effect- the maths
  1. GPS and Sagnac effect. (Replies: 15)

Loading...