How does Savas Dimopoulos' latest paper challenge current SUSY collider limits?

In summary, the conversation discusses a paper on the auto-concealment of supersymmetry in extra dimensions. This mechanism allows for the visible energy in sparticle decays to be reduced and broadened, making it difficult to detect supersymmetry at collider experiments. This applies to theories where the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is a bulk state and the size of the extra dimensions is larger than 10^-14 cm. The paper also discusses how this mechanism can weaken current collider limits on SUSY and provides new search opportunities for extra dimensions. Ultimately, this mechanism shows that SUSY is not a dead horse and is still being actively researched by high energy theorists and phenomenologists.
  • #1
twistor
74
8
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.0805.pdf
Auto-Concealment of Supersymmetry in Extra
Dimensions
Savas Dimopoulos,a Kiel Howe,a,b John March-Russell,c,a James Scovillec,d
aStanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
bSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
cRudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford
1 Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3NP, UK
dUnited States Air Force Institute of Technology
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433, USA
E-mail: savas@stanford.edu, howek@stanford.edu, jmr@thphys.ox.ac.uk,
james.scoville@physics.ox.ac.uk
Abstract: In supersymmetric (SUSY) theories with extra dimensions the visible energy
in sparticle decays can be significantly reduced and its energy distribution broadened, thus
significantly weakening the present collider limits on SUSY. The mechanism applies when
the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is a bulk state—e.g. a bulk modulino, axino, or
gravitino—the size of the extra dimensions >∼ 10−14 cm, and for a broad variety of visible sparticle
spectra. In such cases the lightest ordinary supersymmetric particle (LOSP), necessarily
a brane-localised state, decays to the Kaluza-Klein (KK) discretuum of the LSP. This dynamically
realises the compression mechanism for hiding SUSY as decays into the more numerous
heavier KK LSP states are favored. We find LHC limits on right-handed slepton LOSPs evaporate,
while LHC limits on stop LOSPs weaken to ∼ 350 ÷ 410 GeV compared to ∼ 700 GeV
for a stop decaying to a massless LSP. Similarly, for the searches we consider, present limits
on direct production of degenerate first and second generation squarks drop to ∼ 450 GeV
compared to ∼ 800 GeV for a squark decaying to a massless LSP. Auto-concealment typically
works for a fundamental gravitational scale of M∗ ∼ 10 ÷ 100 TeV, a scale sufficiently
high that traditional searches for signatures of extra dimensions are mostly avoided. If superpartners
are discovered, their prompt, displaced, or stopped decays can also provide new
search opportunities for extra dimensions with the potential to reach M∗ ∼ 109 GeV. This
mechanism applies more generally than just SUSY theories, pertaining to any theory where
there is a discrete quantum number shared by both brane and bulk sectors.
It seems amazing and gives me hope :) I was missing you, SUSY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why hasn't my post been replied to?
 
  • #3
Because SUSY looks like crying wolf at a dead horse. What is so good here that made you hopeful?
 
  • #4
I think section 3, with the weakening of SUSY searches...
 
  • #5
MTd2 said:
Because SUSY looks like crying wolf at a dead horse. What is so good here that made you hopeful?
Perhaps it may be to you, but certainly not to the vast majority of high energy theorists and working phenomenologists out there; this sort of thing has been the topic of several big conferences of late. This paper's explicit model is part of a more general way that supersymmetry can be difficult to detect, even at well trodden energy ranges, which is known as a compressed spectrum.

Unfortunately it will be a very long time before we have any sort of final say on these matters, it just takes a lot of work and very careful searches to eliminate the enormous parameter space that is out there.
 
  • #6
Unfortunately the vast majority(?) does not post here. So, to the vast majority(?) of casual observers, this is like beating a dead horse. And it may be just a matter of time until young casual observers get fed up with this and just give up.
 
  • #7
Well it's not a dead horse. The fact that SUSY gets disfavored as a candidate solution to the Hierarchy problem, doesn't mean it gets disfavored in general [in fact it's needed in lots of applications].
 
  • Like
Likes twistor

1. What is the main topic of Savas Dimopoulos' new paper?

The main topic of Savas Dimopoulos' new paper is the theory of supersymmetry and how it may be tested experimentally.

2. What is the significance of this paper in the field of science?

This paper is significant because it proposes a new way to test the theory of supersymmetry, which is a key concept in particle physics and could potentially help us understand the fundamental nature of our universe.

3. How does this paper contribute to the current scientific understanding?

This paper offers a new perspective and potential experimental evidence for the theory of supersymmetry, which is an important and ongoing area of research in particle physics and cosmology. It adds to the current body of knowledge and may lead to new breakthroughs in our understanding of the universe.

4. What are the potential implications of the findings in this paper?

If the results proposed in this paper are confirmed through experiments, it could provide strong evidence for the existence of supersymmetric particles and potentially revolutionize our understanding of fundamental particles and forces in the universe.

5. Are there any criticisms or limitations of this paper?

As with any scientific paper, there may be criticisms or limitations to the findings presented. Some scientists may argue that the proposed experimental methods are not feasible or that the results are not conclusive enough. Further research and experimentation will be necessary to fully validate the claims made in this paper.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top