Scaling of functions

  • Thread starter mmwave
  • Start date
211
2
In another thread Hallsofivy wrote

I think you are confusing things by always talking about "the function f(cx)". f(cx) does not represent a function, it represents a value of a function. f(x), f(y), f(cx) all refer to the same function, f.
-------------------------------------
Not wanting to hijack someone else's thread I've started this to discuss the following:

I understand that in all cases f( ) is the same function. But if c is greater than one a graph of f(cx) is 'skinnier' than f(x) and when c is less than one f(cx) is 'wider' than f(x). In engineering these are useful tools especially in transforms. x here is the independent variable not a single value. Maybe mathematicians use a different notation to discuss this concept?

Also, if f() is linear function then
f(cx) = c * f(x) for any x and
f(a+b) = f(a) + f(b)
 

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,845
17
You're implicitly defining a new function, g, given by:

g(x) := f(cx)

and it is the graph of this new function, g, that can be "skinnier" or "wider" than the graph of f.


Because of the common abuses of notation, there is some ambiguity in what precisely is meant.
 

Related Threads for: Scaling of functions

  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
584
  • Posted
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top