Scaling of functions

  • Thread starter mmwave
  • Start date
  • #1
211
2
In another thread Hallsofivy wrote

I think you are confusing things by always talking about "the function f(cx)". f(cx) does not represent a function, it represents a value of a function. f(x), f(y), f(cx) all refer to the same function, f.
-------------------------------------
Not wanting to hijack someone else's thread I've started this to discuss the following:

I understand that in all cases f( ) is the same function. But if c is greater than one a graph of f(cx) is 'skinnier' than f(x) and when c is less than one f(cx) is 'wider' than f(x). In engineering these are useful tools especially in transforms. x here is the independent variable not a single value. Maybe mathematicians use a different notation to discuss this concept?

Also, if f() is linear function then
f(cx) = c * f(x) for any x and
f(a+b) = f(a) + f(b)
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
19
You're implicitly defining a new function, g, given by:

g(x) := f(cx)

and it is the graph of this new function, g, that can be "skinnier" or "wider" than the graph of f.


Because of the common abuses of notation, there is some ambiguity in what precisely is meant.
 

Related Threads on Scaling of functions

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
660
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
658
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top