Schrodinger probability problem

In summary, the conversation discusses evaluating the probability of finding an oscillator in the ground state beyond the classical turning points using the normalization constant and wave function. The calculated probability may seem large due to the small space and large kinetic energy involved. The possibility of a problem with units is also mentioned.
  • #1
eku_girl83
89
0
Here's my problem:
Using the normalization constant A=(mw/h*pi)^(1/4) and a = mw/2h, evaluate the probability to find an oscillator in the ground state beyond the classical turning points -A0 and A0. Assume A0= .1nm an k = 1 eV/square nm. The h variables actually represent h/2pi.

The wave function for the ground state is Ae^(-a*x^2). So the square of the wave function is A^2*e^(-2*a*x^2), which I will integrate as x ranges from .1 to infinity.
I found A^2 to be 1.0735 nm^-1 and a = 1.8102 nm^-2.
Subsituting these values and integrating yields .394 (probability of finding the oscillator beyond A0). This seems awfully large. What am I doing wrong? Could I possibly have a problem with units?

Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assuming you have calculated correctly, such large value is possible as you are trying to squeeze to wavefunction in a small space; atomic order. So a wavefunction with such a large curvature leads to a large kinetic energy. As kinetic energy is twice the derivative of "x". With a large kinetic energy this may be possible.
 
  • #3


Your calculation seems correct, but it is possible that you have a problem with units. It is important to make sure that all units are consistent in order to get the correct result. Here are a few things to check:

1. Make sure that all units are in the correct form. In this problem, the units for A0 and k are both in nm, so make sure that the units for h and m are also in nm.

2. Check that the units for the normalization constant A are correct. The formula for A given in the problem is (mw/h*pi)^(1/4), but the units for this should be (nm^-1)^1/4, not (nm)^1/4. This could be a simple mistake in writing out the formula.

3. Double check your calculation for A^2 and a. If these values are incorrect, it will affect your final result.

4. Make sure that the integration is done correctly. It is important to use the correct limits of integration and to perform the integration accurately.

If all of these things are correct and you are still getting a large probability, it could be a problem with the given values of A0 and k. Make sure that these values make sense in the context of the problem and that they are in the correct units. If you are still having trouble, it may be helpful to consult with your teacher or a classmate to see if they can spot any errors in your calculation.
 

1. What is the Schrodinger probability problem?

The Schrodinger probability problem is a thought experiment proposed by physicist Erwin Schrodinger in 1935. It involves a cat in a sealed box with a vial of poison, a radioactive substance, and a Geiger counter. The question is whether the cat is alive or dead before the box is opened, based on the probability of the radioactive substance decaying and triggering the poison. This problem is used to illustrate the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics.

2. What does the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment demonstrate?

The Schrodinger's cat thought experiment demonstrates the concept of superposition, where an object can exist in multiple states simultaneously. In this case, the cat is both alive and dead until the box is opened and the superposition collapses into one definite state.

3. Is the Schrodinger probability problem a paradox?

The Schrodinger probability problem is not a paradox but rather a thought experiment to illustrate the principles of quantum mechanics. It is meant to challenge our understanding of reality and the role of observation in determining the state of a system.

4. What is the relevance of the Schrodinger probability problem in modern science?

The Schrodinger probability problem is still a widely discussed and debated topic in modern science. It has led to further developments in quantum mechanics and our understanding of the subatomic world. It also has implications in fields such as computing and cryptography.

5. Can the Schrodinger probability problem be solved?

The Schrodinger probability problem is not meant to be solved in a traditional sense. It is a thought experiment used to illustrate a concept and challenge our understanding of reality. However, scientists continue to study and explore the principles of quantum mechanics, which may lead to a deeper understanding of this problem and its implications.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
805
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
560
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
549
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
689
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
951
Back
Top