Schrodinger wave equation

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of particles entering a square potential well in quantum mechanics. The book "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths is referenced but the learner is still unsure about the practical application. The expert explains that the concept of particles falling into a well is not realistic and that their energy must change in order for them to become bound. This issue is also present in classical mechanics. The learner asks about the possibility of particles losing kinetic energy to enter a lower energy level, and the expert explains that this is possible if the particle is approaching from infinity and can shed energy through another interaction. The conservation of energy law is also mentioned.
  • #1
learner@123
10
0
Hello everyone

I am searching for the answer for the condition (related to the total energy of the particle E) for which any particle will go into the square potential well.
I have studied Griffiths's quantum mechanics book Introduction to the quantum mechanics Section 2.5 and 2.6) but still not able to relate this to practical situation .
See the attachment for book.

Will be very thankful to your answers
Thanks .
 

Attachments

  • selection.pdf
    746.7 KB · Views: 2,108
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi there, and welcome to PF :smile: !

I am afraid your question isn't completely clear to me: what exactly do you mean with
go into the square potential
since the section should in fact make clear that this isn't what's happening in quantum mechanics ...

And: I assume that you are referring to a finite well (section 2.6) ?
 
  • #3
Thanks for ur positive response

Actually sir i have confusion on trap condition and scattering condition for electron in finite potential well.
In given section 2.6 author discussed two different cases (1)when total energy E is negative i.e trapping condition (2)when total energy E is positive i.e scattering condition.
Now if any electron is traveling on vacuum level its total energy(=PE+KE ) will be always positive since it will always have some kinetic energy that means it will never get into the well.
So sir my confusion is in which condition it will go into the well.

Thanks
 
  • #4
learner@123 said:
Now if any electron is traveling on vacuum level its total energy(=PE+KE ) will be always positive since it will always have some kinetic energy that means it will never get into the well.

The potential energy can be negative, so there's no reason why the sum (PE+KE) cannot be less than zero even though the kinetic energy is always positive.
 
  • #5
Dear learner,

Your "if any electron is travelling... " is about positive energies; for such particles there is a scattering process going on at the position of the well. The solution of the ( for such a case time dependent !) Schroedinger equation is pretty involved. I think there exist animations on the net but I don't know offhand where. http://physics.oregonstate.edu/~rubin/nacphy/CPapplets/QMWAVE/Potbar/Potbar.html?

Anyway, the picture of "falling into the well" isn't very realistic -- in a simple case there is nowhere to go for the energy, so it doesn't stay in if it starts outside.
 
  • #6
BvU said:
in a simple case there is nowhere to go for the energy, so it doesn't stay in if it starts outside.

Exactly. For the idealized situation with the incoming electron represented by a plane wave (definite momentum and kinetic energy), you can calculate transmission and reflection probabilities using the method shown on pages 81-82 of the PDF in the first post. However, those always add to give a total probability of 1. If you want the electron to be trapped inside the well (become a bound state), then you have to have a mechanism for changing the energy from a value > 0 to a value < 0.
 
  • #7
Nugatory said:
The potential energy can be negative, so there's no reason why the sum (PE+KE) cannot be less than zero even though the kinetic energy is always positive.
Sir actually I mentioned that electron is at vacuum level hence its PE will be zero but it will have some KE.
 
  • #8
BvU said:
Dear learner,

Your "if any electron is travelling... " is about positive energies; for such particles there is a scattering process going on at the position of the well. The solution of the ( for such a case time dependent !) Schroedinger equation is pretty involved. I think there exist animations on the net but I don't know offhand where. http://physics.oregonstate.edu/~rubin/nacphy/CPapplets/QMWAVE/Potbar/Potbar.html?

Anyway, the picture of "falling into the well" isn't very realistic -- in a simple case there is nowhere to go for the energy, so it doesn't stay in if it starts outside.
Sir can you suggest any literature regarding that logic it will be good for me ...
 
  • #9
learner@123 said:
Sir actually I mentioned that electron is at vacuum level hence its PE will be zero but it will have some KE.

Ah - yes, if you are dealing with a particle that is approaching from infinity, then it can only end up in a bound state if it can shed some of its energy in some other interaction so that it can be captured by the potential well.

Although you came across this problem in a Quantum Mechanics text, the same issues arise in classical mechanics. We cheerfully pose classical problems involving bound particles (planetary orbits, for example) without considering how they came to be bound in the first place. Obviously they do, as the universe is full of particles that are in bound states; often the mechanism by which this happened is irrelevant to the problem at hand.
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
Exactly. For the idealized situation with the incoming electron represented by a plane wave (definite momentum and kinetic energy), you can calculate transmission and reflection probabilities using the method shown on pages 81-82 of the PDF in the first post. However, those always add to give a total probability of 1. If you want the electron to be trapped inside the well (become a bound state), then you have to have a mechanism for changing the energy from a value > 0 to a value < 0.
Sir you got my problem exactly as i was thinking but still if suppose there are certain energy levels just below vacuum level then Is it possible for electron to loose its kinetic energy to go into lower energy level .How energy conservation law holds
 
  • #11
Nugatory said:
Ah - yes, if you are dealing with a particle that is approaching from infinity, then it can only end up in a bound state if it can shed some of its energy in some other interaction so that it can be captured by the potential well.

Although you came across this problem in a Quantum Mechanics text, the same issues arise in classical mechanics. We cheerfully pose classical problems involving bound particles (planetary orbits, for example) without considering how they came to be bound in the first place. Obviously they do, as the universe is full of particles that are in bound states; often the mechanism by which this happened is irrelevant to the problem at hand.
thank you sir for ur quick reply ...now i understood sir...but sir if the particle is not coming from infinity then what will be the situation on trapping
 
  • #12
A careful word of advice: while still in chapter 2 of Griffiths, don't attempt to make direct links from the material presented to the daily real world. Quantum Mechanics lives in its own miraculous environment and you first want to acquaint yourself with its tools and its methods while studying isolated and exotic phenomena. That's already quite a huge task in itself.
 
  • #13
learner@123 said:
Sir you got my problem exactly

A friendly tip: you don't need to call us "sir." :smile:
 

What is the Schrodinger wave equation?

The Schrodinger wave equation is a mathematical formula used to describe the behavior of quantum particles, such as electrons, in a physical system. It was developed by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger in 1926 and is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics.

How is the Schrodinger wave equation used in physics?

The Schrodinger wave equation is used to determine the probability distribution of a quantum particle in a given physical system. It helps to predict the behavior and properties of particles at the subatomic level, and is essential in understanding the behavior of atoms, molecules, and other small particles.

What are the key components of the Schrodinger wave equation?

The Schrodinger wave equation has two key components: the Hamiltonian operator, which represents the total energy of a particle, and the wave function, which describes the state of the particle. These components work together to determine the probability of finding a particle in a specific location in space.

What are the limitations of the Schrodinger wave equation?

The Schrodinger wave equation is limited in its ability to accurately predict the behavior of particles in certain situations, such as when particles are moving at high speeds or in the presence of strong magnetic fields. It also does not account for the effects of relativity, making it incompatible with Einstein's theory of general relativity.

How does the Schrodinger wave equation relate to the famous "cat in a box" thought experiment?

The Schrodinger wave equation is the basis for the famous "cat in a box" thought experiment, also known as Schrodinger's cat. This thought experiment was designed to illustrate the concept of superposition, where a particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously. In the experiment, a cat is put in a box with a radioactive substance and a Geiger counter. If the substance decays, the Geiger counter triggers a hammer that breaks a vial of poison, killing the cat. According to the Schrodinger wave equation, until the box is opened and the cat is observed, it exists in a superposition of both alive and dead states.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
639
Replies
11
Views
950
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
524
Replies
6
Views
696
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
589
Back
Top