Consider Schrodinger's cat. In QM we say that the cat is alive and dead.(as we wrote them in Schrodinger's wave function)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

That's because nobody knows the cat's state.

What if there is a poison-proof superman in the box with the cat or let's say there is a poison critical to cat but not to human. Of course this man would not do a thing with the cat's state but only tell the cat's state every regular time.

Then what can we say?

Am I asking a dumb thing here?

Is this because we considered a 'cat' ? If we consider a photon or electron (something of which state could be changed only by measuring(this time actually looking at the cat), then can we say it in other way?

Somebody help me out.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Schrodinger's cat

Loading...

Similar Threads - Schrodinger's | Date |
---|---|

I Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation? | Feb 22, 2018 |

I Hamiltonian in Schrödinger: necessarily total energy? | Feb 22, 2018 |

A What form of the Schrodinger equation do you use for intensity? | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Question about the solution to the Harmonic wave equation | Feb 3, 2018 |

I I am interested in Schrodinger equation with tempor. element | Feb 3, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**