Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Schrodinger's Equation - Step Potential

  1. Mar 3, 2005 #1
    In the left side of the barrier, the potential energy V(x)= 0, while on the right side of the barrier, V(x) = V. Given that the total energy of the particle in such a system has a total energy E < V..

    a. What are my acceptable solutions?
    On the left side:

    Should I include the cos kx and sin kx alone?

    b. How do I show that /A/ + /B/ = 1? Are these absolute values of the expressions A and B or /A/ = A*A and /B/ = B*B?

    I got A = C/2 (1 + iq/p) and B = C/2 ( 1 - iq/p)
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 3, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    On the lest side,it's just a combination of complex exponentials...What do you mean "include ...alone"...?

    As for the second,i assume you refer to the coefficients of reflection & transmission.Great.But please,use this CORRECT expression:
    [tex] A^{*}A=|A|^{2} [/tex]

    I don't know who "C" is.Could you be more specific...?

  4. Mar 3, 2005 #3
    Hello sir...

    what I meant about cos px and sin px (not k) alone is that there are 3 solutions... first is that expression A cos px + B sin px, second is cosp x and third is sin px on the left side of the barrier... the right side involves only e^(-qx).

    Hmm... I am referring to my 2 general solutions A cos px + B sin px ( or Ae^(ipx) + Be^(-ipx) ) and Ce^(-px) using then the continuity requirements... I imposed the \psi(x) and the first derivative of \psi at x = 0.

    Thus resulting to A + B = C and ipA - ipb = -qC

    then I tried to find the expressions of A and B in terms of C.. which are A = C/2 (1 + iq/p) and B = C/2 ( 1 - iq/p) respectively.

    But I don't know why [tex] A^{*}A=|A|^{2} [/tex] + [tex] B^{*}B=|B|^{2} [/tex] dont equal to one?
  5. Mar 3, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Why would they...?What' the physical justification behind your requirement...? :bugeye:
    Now,that u've managed to express 2 coefficients in terms of a third,u can resort to the definition of the probablilty currents and transmission and reflection coefficients...

    Isn't this what you're looking for,or what else...?

  6. Mar 3, 2005 #5
    So I will not add both A = C/2 (1 + iq/p) and B = C/2 ( 1 - iq/p) then.

    I got this T = 4(q/p)/(1 + iq/p)^2 and R = /(1 - iq/p) / (1 + iq/p)/^2 ...

    My problem is here is that will they add up to 1?
  7. Mar 3, 2005 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    In square modulus,they MUST,viz.

    [tex] |T|^{2}+|R|^{2}=1 [/tex]

    Else,it would mean your calculations are incorrect.

  8. Mar 3, 2005 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Any, I repeat any QM text does this problem. It will be spelled out right in front of your eyes if you simply take the trouble to read. We are not talking rocket science here, just very basic stuff.
    Reilly Atkinson
  9. Mar 4, 2005 #8
    to irony of truth

    Hi, I'm just passing through, and I don't have much time (just enough to quickly browse).

    If you are still having some questions, irony of truth, you may want to look at the thread below, in particular posts #2 and #10:


    If look, I hope it helps. :smile:

    ... oops! :blushing:
    I see you're looking at the E < V case. My posts were for E > V.
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?