Schrödinger equation for particle on a ring in a magnetic field

  • Thread starter Gavroy
  • Start date
  • #1
235
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

hi

i need the schrödinger equation for a particle(electron) in a ring under the influence of a magnetic field that goes through perpendicular to the plane of the ring and i want to consider the spin too.

Well, the particle in the ring is pretty easy:

[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)=E \psi (\phi) [/itex]

but what is about the magnetic field?

i thought that if i take

[itex]E_{pot}=\mu B=\frac{e m v r}{2m}B=\frac{e l B}{2m} [/itex]

and therefore:
[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)+\frac{i \hbar e}{2m} \psi '(\phi) B=E \psi (\phi) [/itex]

and then i would get an additional term if i want to consider the spin:


[itex]E_{pot}=\mu B=\frac{-g_s \mu_B \sigma }{\hbar }B [/itex]
and therefore:
[itex]- \frac{ \hbar^2}{2mr^2} \psi''(\phi)+\frac{i \hbar e}{2m} \psi '(\phi) B+\frac{-g_s \mu_B \sigma }{\hbar }B\psi(\phi)=E \psi (\phi) [/itex]

so, is this the right equation?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
14,384
5,976
That's not completely correct.

The important point of electromagnetic fields is that it is a gauge field, and thus to get a gauge invariant equation, you have to introduce the covariant derivative

[tex]D_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}+\mathrm{i} q A_{\mu},[/tex]

where [itex]A_{\mu}[/itex] is the four potential of the electromagnetic field. In the following non-relativistic limit I write [itex]A_0=\Phi[/itex] for the scalar potential and [itex]\vec{A}[/itex] for the vector potential.

For non-relativistic without spin you start with the Schroedinger equation for a free particle

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=-\frac{1}{2m} \Delta \psi.[/tex]

To couple the electromagnetic field to it, you just substitute all derivatives by their gauge-covariant derivatives, i.e.,

[tex]\partial_t \rightarrow D_0=\partial_t+\mathrm{i} q \Phi.[/tex]

For the gradient one has

[tex]D_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} + \mathrm{i} q A_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^i} - \mathrm{i} q A^i,[/tex]

i.e. the correct substitution for the nabla operator in 3D-vector analysis notation reads

[tex]\vec{\nabla} \rightarrow \vec{D}=\vec{\nabla}-\mathrm{i} q A^i.[/tex]

Plugging this into the Schrödinger equation, one gets

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}-q \Phi \psi=\frac{1}{2m} (-\mathrm{i} \vec{\nabla}-q \vec{A})^2 \psi[/tex]

or to extract the Hamiltonian

[tex]\mathrm{i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\hat{H} \psi=\frac{1}{2m} [-\Delta \psi - \mathrm{i} \vec{\nabla} \cdot (\vec{A} \psi) - \mathrm{i} \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla} \psi - q^2 \vec{A}^2 \psi]+ q \Phi \psi.[/tex]

For a homogeneous magnetic field you set

[tex]\vec{A}=-\frac{1}{2} \vec{x} \times \vec{B}.[/tex]

To consider spin you indeed only need to add

[tex]\hat{H}_{\text{Spin}}=-\frac{q}{2m} g_S \hat{\vec{S}} \cdot \vec{B}.[/tex]

This leads to the Pauli equation.

For the problem of a particle restricted to a circle, just substitute the gradient and Laplacean in spherical coordinates and set [itex]\partial/\partial r=\partial/\partial \vartheta=0[/itex].
 

Related Threads on Schrödinger equation for particle on a ring in a magnetic field

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
768
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
14K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top