Schroedinger Equation

  • #1
Hi all, I am a 10th grade student who has a basic grasp on matrices, differential calculus and can integrate. I am having trouble with the Schrödinger equation (which part? where to start and just all of it)I was wondering where I could find a detailed stepwise walkthrough to the Schrödinger equation. It would be nice to have one in both one and 2 dimensions. Thanks for ANY help that I receive.

I also don't get the iH part what are you supposed to do there? and by the way I live in a place where it's virtually impossible to get an advanced physics textbook.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,948
200
Do you have any experience with wave equations? Or any partial differential equations? What about complex numbers?

Also, there is more than one way to write the Schrödinger equation so it would be helpful if you let us know the exact equation you're talking about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
jtbell
Mentor
15,735
3,892
The first example of solving the Schrödinger equation, that just about everybody does, is the "infinite square well" a.k.a. "particle in a box." Have you seen that yet?

A Google search for "infinite square well" turns up lots of lecture notes, many of which unfortunately seem to assume you have a book handy, or are supplements to an in-class lecture. This page, however, seems to be mostly self-contained, and does it pretty much the way I used to do it in a second-year intro modern physics course:

http://physicspages.com/2011/01/26/the-infinite-square-well-particle-in-a-box/

It does make reference to another page on the time-independent SE:

http://physicspages.com/2011/01/22/the-time-independent-schrodinger-equation/
 
  • #4
270
5
Hi all, I am a 10th grade student who has a basic grasp on matrices, differential calculus and can integrate. I am having trouble with the Schrödinger equation (which part? where to start and just all of it)I was wondering where I could find a detailed stepwise walkthrough to the Schrödinger equation. It would be nice to have one in both one and 2 dimensions. Thanks for ANY help that I receive.
I suspect that you don't have any real experience with physics, and are trying to start off with QM. You can't fully appreciate QM without having studied (bare-minimum) classical mechanics. It's very much like trying to watch a movie in a foreign language without even knowing the alphabet.

If you're really dead-set on trying to learn QM, you could try a book like Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics", but I don't think anybody here would advise this, especially since you haven't told us about your physics background.
I also don't get the iH part what are you supposed to do there?
##\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\nabla ^2 +V## is the Hamiltonian operator, and ##i## is the imaginary number.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
the only thing I have experience with is calculus, any website that teaches the higher math in a format that's easy to understand? Plus what's the inverted triangle?
 
  • #6
jtbell
Mentor
15,735
3,892
The "inverted triangle" is the nabla operator. In Schrödinger's equation, you see its square:
$$\nabla^2 \psi = \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial z^2}$$

Have you studied partial derivatives yet? (e.g. ##\partial \psi / \partial x##)

In the USA, people usually learn these in the third semester of an undergraduate calculus course. It often goes by the name "vector calculus." Even introductory QM books and web pages assume that you have studied that much calculus, and are at least acquainted with the basic ideas of differential equations.
 
  • #7
I can do differential equations, I have not done pde's yet though...any links? sorry to bother.
 
  • #8
jtbell
Mentor
15,735
3,892
You really don't need to know anything special about PDEs in order to start learning about solving Schrödinger's equation. If you know what partial derivatives are, you'll be OK.

In the standard examples that all introductory QM textbooks use, the first thing they do is use the "separation of variables" technique to convert the partial differential equation into two or more ordinary differential equations. The second page that I linked to above describes that.
 
  • #9
If I can solve Schrödinger eqn can I then solve any physics equation? aside from ones in general relativity.
 
  • #10
615
35
If I can solve Schrödinger eqn can I then solve any physics equation? aside from ones in general relativity.
No.

It's just one equation. There are inumerous more to solve too.

Some equations even have no analytical solution.
 
  • #13
jtbell
Mentor
15,735
3,892
Even Schrödinger's equation has analytical solutions (ones that you can write down formulas for) for only a few highly symmetric situations. In general, you have to use numerical methods to generate the solution point by point and e.g. make a graph of it.
 
  • #14
270
5
If I can solve Schrödinger eqn can I then solve any physics equation? aside from ones in general relativity.
I don't mean to be rude, but what are you talking about? I seriously can't see a point in studying QM without knowing any physics beforehand. Asking a question like this is ridiculous (and also extremely vague). The answer is a big "NO". As others have said, most ODEs,PDEs can't be solved analytically, and Schrödinger's equation is not "One equation to rule them all"

We have countless people coming on the forums, both kids and adults, asking to "learn" quantum mechanics when they haven't studied any prior physics/math. There's a reason QM is not taught (generally) as a first year course. Physics is way more than mathematics. Just because you have experience with calculus (and I suspect little experience, too) doesn't mean you understand the physics!

I appreciate that you are eager to study physics, but please DO IT THE RIGHT WAY. A great first textbook is An Introduction to Mechanics. The math is simple, but the physics is fairly advanced for a first year text. It doesn't cover Lagrangian mechanics, but you can use another book for that.
 
  • #15
True astrum, but what I meant was assuming you learned math in the same sequence taught by schools up until integral calculus could you solve the vast majority of physics equations aside form topological ones or ones that require tensors? i.e. does it get harder than pde's and tensors?

Introduction to Mechanics. The math is simple, but the physics is fairly advanced for a first year text. It doesn't cover Lagrangian mechanics, but you can use another book for that.
I really don't have money for textbooks, or in general. Hence me asking for links.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
270
5
I really don't have money for textbooks, or in general. Hence me asking for links.
Yeah, the answer is still no. Linear Algebra is a very important field that is used all the time in physics, you'll encounter a lot in QM (although not too much in Griffiths QM).

I'm sure you can use "other means" for getting textbooks. Linking illegal content will get your post removed, but I'm sure you're resourceful enough to do it on your own.
 
  • #17
king vitamin
Science Advisor
Gold Member
485
238
I really don't have money for textbooks, or in general. Hence me asking for links.
Many professors and universities post excellent lectures and lecture notes online, and being good at googling for these is also a good method for learning. A good way to filter for these is to put "site:.edu" in with your google search, automatically returning results from an .edu domain so that you're more likely to return lecture notes.

My undergrad quantum mechanics professor posted all of his course books for free online:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.html
 
  • #18
Hey, I can do it now thanks to YouTube! :) Thanks for all your help
 
  • #19
meBigGuy
Gold Member
2,323
405

Related Threads on Schroedinger Equation

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
12K
Top