Schrödinger's "What is life?"

  • Thread starter JonDrew
  • Start date
  • #1
64
0
I just read Schrödinger's "What is life?" and was very confused by some of the things he said in his epilogue, some help understanding it would be great!

What does he mean by the "plurality hypothesis"? I think he means that idea that multiple consciousnesses could make up one consciousness but I seemed to have missed what he meant by that, I think.

Was he meaning to talk negatively about Kant when he said "For this extravagance Kant is responsible."? I think he is but I really don't know.

And finally when he states "In no case is there a loss of personal existence to deplore. Nor will there ever be." does he mean to offer a proof that we can know who we are because we are so far below the 'melting point' of the aperiodic crystals which make up our consciousness. Or in other word since our brains can be model as if they were at absolute zero we can be assured, from the laws of thermodynamics and quantum physics, that we are willful beings? I am sooooo confused by what he meant by this last line.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Curious3141
Homework Helper
2,843
87
Not trying to rain on your parade or drown your enthusiasm, but philosophy (even when espoused by famous physicists) is a strict 'no-no' in PF.
 
  • #3
Evo
Mentor
23,154
2,802
Curious is correct, we stopped purely philosophical discussions.
 

Related Threads on Schrödinger's "What is life?"

  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
2K
Top