Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Chemistry
Biology and Medical
Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Computing and Technology
DIY Projects
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Chemistry
Biology and Medical
Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Computing and Technology
DIY Projects
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Other Sciences
Computing and Technology
Exploring AI Safety with Scott Aaronson
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Jarvis323, post: 6831022, member: 475688"] I think Scott is just pointing this out, and then making a suggestion to broaden and depoliticize it. I see it more as (what Scott sees as) a flaw in our collective effort so far, rather than a flaw in his blog post. I don't think a definition is needed. We don't have such a definition for human intelligence. For AI or human intelligence, we may never have one. The complexity is generally beyond our ability to pin down through analytical thinking. I prefer a more functional basis. What can it do? This depends on the specific instance of technology. And what is possible? In general it is unknown, or not agreed on. Also, I don't see it as a topic to debate, so much as a topic to study. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Other Sciences
Computing and Technology
Exploring AI Safety with Scott Aaronson
Back
Top