• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Engineering Second Order Circuit

  • Thread starter Tekneek
  • Start date
70
0
1. Homework Statement

For second order circuits, do you apply kcl/kvl in the circuit when the switch is open or closed to find the differential equation for complimentary solution?

For example for the circuit attached (the circuit has been operating for a long time with switch closed prior to t=0), applying kcl at the node after adding the two resistors in the parallel:

iL + V(t)/0.6kohms + [V(t)-VC(t)]/3kohms = 0

Not sure what to do after this (lets say if i want to find current in inductor when t>0)
 

Attachments

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
When the switch is closed for "a long time" so that the circuit achieves a steady state, what will the inductor and capacitor "look like" electrically? From that you should be able to determine the steady state current through the inductor. This will determine the starting conditions for the inductor circuit at the moment the switch opens...
 
70
0
When the switch is closed for "a long time" so that the circuit achieves a steady state, what will the inductor and capacitor "look like" electrically? From that you should be able to determine the steady state current through the inductor. This will determine the starting conditions for the inductor circuit at the moment the switch opens...
After long time inductor looks like short circuit and capacitor looks like open circuit. The steady state current through the inductor would be 0.015Amps. What i am trying to find is the equation for iL when t>0
 

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
After long time inductor looks like short circuit and capacitor looks like open circuit. The steady state current through the inductor would be 0.015Amps. What i am trying to find is the equation for iL when t>0
Right. So now you know the initial current that is flowing through the inductor when the switch opens. That's an initial condition. You should be able to write the differential equation by applying KVL.
 
70
0
You should be able to write the differential equation by applying KVL.
So do i apply the KVL assuming the switch is open or closed? Because the two would be different.
 

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
So do i apply the KVL assuming the switch is open or closed? Because the two would be different.
The switch opens at t = 0 and you want the circuit behavior for t > 0... surely that means you want the circuit behavior for when the switch is open.

You analyze the circuit when the switch is closed in order to find the initial conditions that start things off for the open switch arrangement.
 

NascentOxygen

Mentor
9,216
1,057
So do i apply the KVL assuming the switch is open or closed? Because the two would be different.
You are looking for the differential equation of circuit behaviour when the switch is open.

Or more precisely, you are looking for the differential equation of circuit behaviour when the switch is opened and kept open.
 
70
0
The switch opens at t = 0 and you want the circuit behavior for t > 0... surely that means you want the circuit behavior for when the switch is open.

You analyze the circuit when the switch is closed in order to find the initial conditions that start things off for the open switch arrangement.
This means I will have two differential equations?

1) L(di(t)/dt) + i(t)R = 10

2) Cdv(t)/dt + V(t)/R = 0, where R is the two resistors in the Right of the switch added in series.

Solving 1.

General Solution: Ae^(-t/[itex]\tau[/itex]) + B

Complimentary Solution will be Ae^(-t/[itex]\tau[/itex])

For Particular solution, iL(∞) = 10/1000 = 10mA = B

But when I try to solve just using differential equation I don't get B = 10mA

For example since my forcing function is a constant, I plug in a constant B in my diff eq, then I get

B = 10*(L/R)

Am solving my Diff. Eq. wrong way?
 

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
This means I will have two differential equations?

1) L(di(t)/dt) + i(t)R = 10

2) Cdv(t)/dt + V(t)/R = 0, where R is the two resistors in the Right of the switch added in series.

Solving 1.

General Solution: Ae^(-t/[itex]\tau[/itex]) + B

Complimentary Solution will be Ae^(-t/[itex]\tau[/itex])

For Particular solution, iL(∞) = 10/1000 = 10mA = B

But when I try to solve just using differential equation I don't get B = 10mA

For example since my forcing function is a constant, I plug in a constant B in my diff eq, then I get

B = 10*(L/R)

Am solving my Diff. Eq. wrong way?
Your equation (1) looks like it pertains to the timeframe t > 0, when the switch is open. As such there should be the initial conditions that are in force at time t = 0. Those initial conditions are the result of the circuit activity that holds while the switch has been closed "for a very long time". Find those initial conditions first (that is, determine the current flowing through L at that time).

Your value for B should be the "final" current that flows through the inductor a long time after the switch has been opened. If you look a the terms of your differential equation, the component ##A e^{-t/\tau}## goes to zero as t → ∞, leaving just the B term.
 
70
0
Your value for B should be the "final" current that flows through the inductor a long time after the switch has been opened. If you look a the terms of your differential equation, the component ##A e^{-t/\tau}## goes to zero as t → ∞, leaving just the B term.
That is what i did and got B = 10mA. But shouldn't I get the same answer by just solving the Original (1) differential equation?
 

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
That is what i did and got B = 10mA. But shouldn't I get the same answer by just solving the Original (1) differential equation?
Sure. Can you show your work? It seems to me that when dI/dt goes to zero (i.e. steady state), you're left with an expression that should yield your value for B...
 
70
0
Sure. Can you show your work? It seems to me that when dI/dt goes to zero (i.e. steady state), you're left with an expression that should yield your value for B...
So my diff. eq. is

L(di(t)/dt) + i(t)R = 10

To find complimentary solution I make my diff eq. homogeneous (set right hand side to 0)
This gives me Ae..part which I understand.

But for particular solution, I look at the forcing function f(t) and use a trial function to solve the diff. eq.
And since my f(t)=10=constant I plug in lets say X (a constant) in my differential equation,

LdX/dt + XR = 10
0 + XR = 10
X=10/R = 10/1000 = 10mA

lol nvm i think i made a mistake earlier in my calculation they do turn out to be the same.

So as a general rule when you write a differential equation for these circuits with switch...it depends whether the switch is open or closed after a t=0?
 

gneill

Mentor
20,489
2,615
So my diff. eq. is

L(di(t)/dt) + i(t)R = 10

To find complimentary solution I make my diff eq. homogeneous (set right hand side to 0)
This gives me Ae..part which I understand.

But for particular solution, I look at the forcing function f(t) and use a trial function to solve the diff. eq.
And since my f(t)=10=constant I plug in lets say X (a constant) in my differential equation,

LdX/dt + XR = 10
0 + XR = 10
X=10/R = 10/1000 = 10mA

lol nvm i think i made a mistake earlier in my calculation they do turn out to be the same.
:smile: That's good news!

So as a general rule when you write a differential equation for these circuits with switch...it depends whether the switch is open or closed after a t=0?
The general rule would be to determine the state of the circuit immediately before the switch changes (currents, potentials), then carry those over as the initial conditions for the circuit that "appears" after the switch changes. Usually that means finding the steady state conditions for current and potential differences ("after a long time...") for the time immediately before the switch change.

When dealing with first order situations (RC or RL circuits), often one can write out the expression for the desired current or voltage simply by knowing the initial and final conditions and "connecting" them by a suitable exponential function with the obvious time constant (RC or L/R). No solving of differential equations required :smile:
 
70
0
:smile: That's good news!



The general rule would be to determine the state of the circuit immediately before the switch changes (currents, potentials), then carry those over as the initial conditions for the circuit that "appears" after the switch changes. Usually that means finding the steady state conditions for current and potential differences ("after a long time...") for the time immediately before the switch change.

When dealing with first order situations (RC or RL circuits), often one can write out the expression for the desired current or voltage simply by knowing the initial and final conditions and "connecting" them by a suitable exponential function with the obvious time constant (RC or L/R). No solving of differential equations required :smile:
Great! Thanks!
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Second Order Circuit" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Second Order Circuit

Replies
8
Views
627
Replies
1
Views
257
Replies
1
Views
432
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top