Second Quantization

  • Thread starter Euphemia
  • Start date
  • #1
12
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi,all
What is the motivation of using Second Quantization ?
What kind of situation does people want to use field operators ?
Euphemia
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
atyy
Science Advisor
13,854
2,135
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, second quantization is mathematically equivalent to the Schroedinger equation. Take a lattice of atoms and write the Schroedinger equation. Second quantization essentially just taking the Fourier transform, and the "particles" are Fourier modes. Since it is natural for Fourier modes to be created and destroyed, these are useful for describing "particles" which are created and destroyed. In the relativistic case, one postulates the second quantized version directly without an underlying lattice.
 
  • #3
tom.stoer
Science Advisor
5,766
161
The framework of non-rel. QM based on the Schroedinger equation is not suitabe for the description of creation and annihilation of particles, e.g. electron - positron annihilation (and production of two photons). In order to achieve that one needs 'second quantization'
 
  • #4
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
10,875
3,582
In non-relativistic QM, second quantization is a mathematical trick useful to write many-particle wave functions in a symmetric (Bose-Einstein statistics) or antisymmetric (Fermi-Dirac statistic) form automatically.
 
  • #5
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,988
543
There's no <second> quantization, there's only <quantization> which means passing from classical Hamiltonian observables to quantum counterparts where they exist and are uniquely defined (Groeneveld-van Hove problem).
 
  • #7
4
0
Calculating Occupation Numbers. It's a math trick at best.
 
  • #8
Fra
3,097
144
There's no <second> quantization, there's only <quantization> which means passing from classical Hamiltonian observables to quantum counterparts where they exist and are uniquely defined (Groeneveld-van Hove problem).
Meaning you can either see it as a one time thing (and then face the question, why stop there?), or (the way I prefer it) as defining an induction step and then worry about howto interpret that tower of turtles.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/nth_quantization.html contains some interesting ponderings.

/Fredrik
 
  • #9
A. Neumaier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2019 Award
7,325
3,235
What is the motivation of using Second Quantization ?
What kind of situation does people want to use field operators ?
It is very basic for an understanding of quantum statistical mechanics, where almost everything gets much simpler in the second quantization formulation using fields.

Some people don't like the terminology, but it is very standard.
(But one should not imagine that it is literally a quantization of something already quantized.)
 

Related Threads on Second Quantization

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
934
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
530
Top