Let [tex]R[/tex] be the set of real numbers and let [tex] <, \leq [/tex] have their usual meanings.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Show that [tex] \{ x \in R : 0 \leq x \leq 3\} \cap \{ x \in R : -1 < x < 1\} = \{ x \in R : 0 \leq x < 1\} [/tex]

This seems very straight forward, but I am having trouble with wording and figuring out what is sufficient enough to conclude the proof.

So here is what I would argue.

By the definition of the intersection of two sets we have

[tex] \{ x \in R : 0 \leq x \leq 3\} \cap \{ x \in R : -1 < x < 1\} = \{ x \in R : 0 \leq x \leq 3 and -1 < x < 1 \} [/tex]

Here is where I am not sure about the language that I need to use...

Can I just say something like:

The only way both conditions can be true is if [tex]0 \leq x < 1[/tex]

Therefore we have [tex]\{ x \in R : 0 \leq x \leq 3 and -1 < x < 1 \} = \{ x \in R : 0 \leq x < 1\}[/tex]

Or should I not treat this as obvious???

Or is there a better way to approach this all together?

My definition of intersection is as follows:

[tex] X \cap Y = \{x : x\in X and x\in Y\} [/tex]

Up to this point there is no formal treatment of either open and closed intervals, so I am not sure how informal or obvious I should assume them to be.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Seemingly simple problem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Seemingly simple problem | Date |
---|---|

I A seemingly simple problem about probability | Jan 29, 2018 |

Probability that seems easy but not! | Dec 9, 2011 |

Probability of a random number - seems impossible | Apr 28, 2011 |

Derangement Recurrence Relation Proof Doesn't Seem To Make Sense | Oct 23, 2010 |

It seems easy, but I don't get it | Aug 27, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**