1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Seesaw and torque

  1. Mar 30, 2008 #1
    When I do some physics derivation, I find that on a seesaw, if the object is farther away from the fulcrum, the angular acceleration decreases. Is this true? If not, where did I go wrong?
    [tex]\tau = I \cdot \alpha[/tex]

    [tex]\tau=F \cdot r[/tex]

    Then, [tex]\alpha = \frac{F \cdot r}{I} = \frac{F_g \cdot r}{mr^2}=\frac{g \cdot m \cdot r}{mr^2}=\frac{g}{r}[/tex], so if the distance "r" increases, angular acceleration decreases...did I do something wrong?
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 30, 2008 #2


    Staff: Mentor

    That is correct.
  4. Mar 30, 2008 #3
    Are you sure? Some people have told me that it's wrong, because I have to account for the mass of the seesaw.
  5. Mar 30, 2008 #4


    Staff: Mentor

    It's not that it is wrong, it simply makes some assumptions. The formula you derived is for a point mass on a massless seesaw. If your seesaw is not light enough to approximate as massless or if your load is too large to be considered a point then your formula doesn't apply.
  6. Mar 30, 2008 #5
    What if I cannot assume the masses are negligible? How would I derive that? And in that case, would angular acceleration increase?
  7. Mar 31, 2008 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Just include the rotational inertia of the seesaw as part of the total rotational inertia:
    [tex]I_{total} = I_{seesaw} + mr^2 = 1/12 M L^2 + mr^2[/tex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Seesaw and torque
  1. What is torque? (Replies: 4)

  2. Torque and force (Replies: 12)

  3. Torque questions (Replies: 4)