I am not sure again, whether this belongs here or in mathematics.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

When we have a partial differential equation, in general we can write the solution of [itex]F(r,t)[/itex] as:

[itex]F(r,t)=R(r)T(t)[/itex]

In the procedure of separating the differential equation, we find ourselves dividing with [itex]F(r,t)[/itex].

Isn't that actually problematic for points where [itex]R[/itex] or [itex]T[/itex] happen to be zero? I know that they can't be zero everywhere coz the solution would be trivial, but what stops them from being zero at distinct points? Actually nothing...

The only solution to this problem would be the imposing of continuity at the point of interest, setting the left side solution equal to the right side. But dividing with zero is still a problem :(

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Seperation of solutions

Loading...

Similar Threads - Seperation solutions | Date |
---|---|

Separation of variables to solve Schrodinger equation | Feb 12, 2015 |

Time-independence of seperable solutions of the Schrödinger eqn | Feb 6, 2014 |

Schrodinger Equation and seperation of variables | Jul 2, 2012 |

Difference Between Non-Seperability and Non-Locality? | Mar 24, 2011 |

Seperation of variables, infinite cubic well | Apr 28, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**